From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C3A17E8E4 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719349103; cv=none; b=QatWRopbNpvVSMewT8b+YhBdkA1jl56Vwrj6IKLfy/yMjRqTLztIPmJ8tW5AczCnpQU8dflVmy+XeqwKc8/Hh6gQkb+07zPuEO6RdRdyU+PupU1SWJv+D0vBxR2GRsxKmEgA+b6ZFwuMDfm0eRc2yYz4VjlMKBMXkcDb/NSZkPs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719349103; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cQwRCG3VHCGaWLzgjsD9FJP3jA8PzqxiXaMYPbG5W7k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IPWUBJ9zgidt1yAIU7Qf9W1SDApa2DOeDimoS52Svvwj42bVkztK8GFMNZzmxUMWz/7E2aUYJ8K6rMkCc28wyVOFXVFm80olBCgMm1sCLcAbFA493TQyUVFDLazmVtsJIz0+jduRtw06HgxFWAxcbGKOjCbXoOBeerS9JVGsI+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=Jdb5+qWk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Jdb5+qWk" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5141C418; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:58:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cQwRCG3VHCGaWLzgjsD9FJP3jA8PzqxiXaMYPb G5W7k=; b=Jdb5+qWkkhqwzBH+QbPFdKD0YumV0fza6yTKzXs7rgJI/EYP3vTl6A y3cGyD+AeqfQqACTPLNwVkE0V/ytQv7i/iuFXE1XoVTkmQb/Asxp/GRzLgkTUTvI LhmnoMYb/L8+ZAZi4lvkYSq+X4gpz8Dhn9E98sXKfUE2PeFajAGUs= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DB61C417; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:58:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.204.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 108DE1C416; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:58:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 1/1] Teach git version --build-options about zlib+libcurl In-Reply-To: <03ef01dac735$f3496ac0$d9dc4040$@nexbridge.com> (rsbecker@nexbridge.com's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:29:03 -0400") References: <20240621154552.62038-1-randall.becker@nexbridge.ca> <20240621154552.62038-2-randall.becker@nexbridge.ca> <016501dac409$7dd5bc00$79813400$@nexbridge.com> <03ef01dac735$f3496ac0$d9dc4040$@nexbridge.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:58:18 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A70F582E-3335-11EF-AA37-965B910A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com writes: > My take on the separate patches and discussion about reporting run-time > values of libcurl, zlib, and OpenSSL, is that these are being added to > --build-options not --runtime-options (does not exist yet). I think that > grabbing run-time values could be confusing to users who expect the > --build-options even if comparing the two values. Yup. I thought that the consensus was to leave all those extra complexities like runtime versions for a later and separate topic done after the dust from this change settles. Thanks.