Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] t7800: fix quoting of looped test bodies

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> Hi,
>
> this is the second version of my patch series that aims to address some
> issues with looping around `test_expect_success` in t7800.

Looking good.  Thanks.  Will queue.

Let's mark it for 'next' already ;-)

>
> Changes compared to v1:
>
>     - Fixed indentation of a paragraph in "t/README".
>
>     - Added a clarification why one wants to use single quotes to
>       "t/README".
>
> Thanks!
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick Steinhardt (3):
>   t7800: improve test descriptions with empty arguments
>   t7800: use single quotes for test bodies
>   t/README: document how to loop around test cases
>
>  t/README            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  t/t7800-difftool.sh | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> Range-diff against v1:
> 1:  fd37c29319 = 1:  fd37c29319 t7800: improve test descriptions with empty arguments
> 2:  a4ca974397 = 2:  a4ca974397 t7800: use single quotes for test bodies
> 3:  326fb79650 ! 3:  f83b710208 t/README: document how to loop around test cases
>     @@ t/README: The "do's:"
>      +		'
>      +	done
>      +
>     -+  Note that while the test title uses double quotes ("), the test body
>     -+  should continue to use single quotes ('). The loop variable will be
>     -+  accessible regardless of the single quotes as the test body is passed
>     -+  to `eval`.
>     ++   Note that while the test title uses double quotes ("), the test body
>     ++   should continue to use single quotes (') to avoid breakage in case the
>     ++   values contain e.g. quoting characters. The loop variable will be
>     ++   accessible regardless of the single quotes as the test body is passed
>     ++   to `eval`.
>      +
>       
>       And here are the "don'ts:"