From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:59:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmt6f4l03.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8hX+pIZUKXsyYj5@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:35:06 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> [1/6]: t1007: modernize malformed object tests
Obviously good.
> [2/6]: t1006: stop using 0-padded timestamps
> [3/6]: t7030: stop using invalid tag name
These two are pleasant to see and revealed what are "accepted" by
mistake, quite surprisingly.
> [4/6]: t: use hash-object --literally when created malformed objects
The --literally option was invented initially primarily to allow a
bogus type of object (e.g. "hash-object -t xyzzy --literally") but I
am happy to see that we are finding different uses. I wonder if
these objects of known types but with syntactically bad contents can
be "repack"ed from loose into packed?
> [5/6]: fsck: provide a function to fsck buffer without object struct
Obvious, clean and very nice.
> [6/6]: hash-object: use fsck for object checks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 20:35 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] t1007: modernize malformed object tests Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:13 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-18 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] t1006: stop using 0-padded timestamps Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] t7030: stop using invalid tag name Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] t: use hash-object --literally when created malformed objects Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:19 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:06 ` Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] fsck: provide a function to fsck buffer without object struct Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:24 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:07 ` Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] hash-object: use fsck for object checks Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:34 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:31 ` Jeff King
2023-02-01 12:50 ` Jeff King
2023-02-01 13:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 20:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-18 20:46 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-01-18 21:38 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:03 ` Jeff King
2023-01-19 1:39 ` Jeff King
2023-01-19 23:13 ` [PATCH 7/6] fsck: do not assume NUL-termination of buffers Jeff King
2023-01-19 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-21 9:36 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects René Scharfe
2023-01-22 7:48 ` Jeff King
2023-01-22 11:39 ` René Scharfe
2023-02-01 14:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqmt6f4l03.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.