From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Mark remote `gc --auto` error messages Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:59:51 -0700 Message-ID: References: <146489432847.688.11121862368709034386@typhoon> <146489800609.1944.4398103814754920753@typhoon.lan> <20160602214834.GB13356@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Lukas Fleischer , Git Mailing List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 03 00:00:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b8aen-0008Nn-T8 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932731AbcFBV74 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:59:56 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54002 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932240AbcFBV7z (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:59:55 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCC8210BB; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:59:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=pY35Rpcmr+xw4Ogu5I2XbtXzKGY=; b=HUGdOY xGsOEi2NACEzUPfvbirjc+l8Bc/atcCCgnL5rV1UipQ6/h/2x8IIoolNTsfA1ED1 Jsvdm0yPasTHJE0AjR3SFVx2RCpzIfPIOllhXnLIsCy0WSqy/D75I0zTHU+4L2Bw NMcm2o9+i4mVswBwOMT0BYi9mTpEhxiyvxr/U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=pV9U8pTbm+I7a9YLWsROhAjHtuH+7hY4 cE9IP66UxX8spx3SYlNQTlJ/GLszI09RpwWpy1414yo8KdW+9l9b5IaSxilVoifE 2Qv6HMfPPKLppgd6IqouxY6xjZsUAdqd6ePn3KVfUWqGEekvSqsPdOADgYw+SKOJ XFS1qaqdUtY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4577B210BA; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:59:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6D04210B8; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:59:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160602214834.GB13356@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:48:35 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 562981EA-290D-11E6-ACE6-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > So the greater question is not "should this output be marked" but > "should auto-gc data go over the sideband so that all clients see it > (and any server-side stderr does not)". And I think the answer is > probably yes. And that fixes the "remote: " thing as a side effect. Thanks for stating this a lot more clearly than I could, and I agree that sending this to the other side regardless of the protocol is the right thing. I somehow doubt that server operators would check Apache logs to decide when to do a proper GC, so I do not consider it a true loss ;-)