From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule: stop sanitizing config options Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:56:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160504062618.GA9849@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160504074559.GA3077@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160504080047.GA2436@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160505012219.GA15090@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160505201416.GD9162@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jeff King , Jacob Keller , Johannes Schindelin , "git\@vger.kernel.org" To: Stefan Beller X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 06 21:56:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aylrf-0000kf-Vu for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 21:56:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758533AbcEFT4k (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 15:56:40 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:62020 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758275AbcEFT4j (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 15:56:39 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8634118689; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:56:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7nx9VLt2Fnj6GqGJVwHr/OJheak=; b=EHVE4b EV1arpaCD0Ch+iFKUnaJrf4NeS8mGv55c8BJF1gAkFqgPYUY607aJ+UPDdv7Bg77 eHPrv3D9ZNBBjt1fYfOsADFA3DytLyWkaBxy1vt4tjWvQ9Qjqh7vx7hHq8QI8eyv KjKBpKt+uI3KQQHhf0RZA7kE7djdlximRSXHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=m/iPCzlafmr/9dqCWz7bpplt6VR/toJY wZcGyH9ZRgdpuoULGL2nfSPUGhwvVrLFnVxxg2hVhb8IyXXJ8mO4KVymZUQb3Lvc 6JQEUzKDVxuW5poYvr0+gVjWY/e5tZQQQgNNW36dMuwVZAY6pBjj2WCdCxY4oPzP Smucyf2hduI= Received: from pb-smtp1. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7FD18688; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:56:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3D4E18687; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:56:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Thu, 5 May 2016 17:23:51 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A4B8DF3A-13C4-11E6-8EC5-9A9645017442-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stefan Beller writes: >> Hmph, Stefan, do you want to keep this (if you want to resurrect the >> function in some future, for example)? > > IMHO it is easier to revert or rewrite than to carry unused code? > Unused code is not tested and untested code is broken code. > And relying on broken code in the future will guarantee bugs. > (Sure new code may also have bugs, but I just think that bugs > in newly written code can be fixed easier) > > I would prefer to get rid of it, i.e. taking that patch. OK.