From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: graysongordon-gl <graysongordon1@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, avarab@gmail.com, ps@pks.im
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] http: add http.sslVerifyStatus to check stapled OCSP responses
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:12:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqo6ezw5l1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818193710.56955-1-ggordon@gitlab.com> (graysongordon-gl's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:37:10 -0400")
graysongordon-gl <graysongordon1@gmail.com> writes:
> +http.sslVerifyStatus::
> + Whether to check the revocation status of the server
> + certificate using the stapled OCSP response supplied during
> + the TLS handshake ("OCSP stapling"). Defaults to false.
> ++
> +This is fail-closed: if the server staples no response, verification
> +fails. Set it per remote, e.g.
> +`http.https://example.com/.sslVerifyStatus`, rather than globally.
I do not see us describe a knob or setting that can stop the
operation depending on some condition as "fail-closed". Can we
rephrase this for regular human beings? Perhaps
Whether to refuse connecting to the server when its
certificate has been revoked. Default to false, allowing
connection even when its certificate is not known to be
still valid.
or something like that might be a good starting point. After all,
the "check revocation and/or validity" is *not* the primary
objective from the end-user's point of view. Ensuring that they do
not talk to suspicious servers is.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 17:02 [PATCH] http: add http.sslVerifyStatus to check stapled OCSP responses graysongordon-gl
2026-08-11 19:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-11 20:44 ` [PATCH v2] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-12 6:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-12 15:53 ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-12 14:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-12 18:25 ` [PATCH v3] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-12 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-13 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH v4] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-17 19:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 7:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:51 ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-18 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 19:37 ` [PATCH v5] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-18 20:12 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-08-18 21:22 ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-18 21:48 ` [PATCH v6] " graysongordon-gl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqo6ezw5l1.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=graysongordon1@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.