Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] t5541: remove lockfile creation

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 08:24:30PM +0000, Justin Tobler via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
>> -	# the new branch should not have been created upstream
>> -	test_must_fail git -C "$d" show-ref --verify refs/heads/atomic &&
>> -
>> -	# upstream should still reflect atomic2, the last thing we pushed
>> -	# successfully
>> -	git rev-parse atomic2 >expected &&
>> -	# ...to other.
>> -	git -C "$d" rev-parse refs/heads/other >actual &&
>> -	test_cmp expected actual &&
>> -
>> -	# the new branch should not have been created upstream
>> +	# The atomic and other branches should be created upstream.
>>  	test_must_fail git -C "$d" show-ref --verify refs/heads/atomic &&
>> +	test_must_fail git -C "$d" show-ref --verify refs/heads/other &&
>
> This last comment should say "should not be created", I think?
>
> Other than that, both patches look good to me.

Thanks.  Will queue with the following and "Acked-by: peff".

diff --git c/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh w/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh
index 9a8bed6c32..71428f3d5c 100755
--- c/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh
+++ w/t/t5541-http-push-smart.sh
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ test_expect_success 'push --atomic fails on server-side errors' '
 	# --atomic should cause entire push to be rejected
 	test_must_fail git push --atomic "$up" atomic other 2>output  &&
 
-	# The atomic and other branches should be created upstream.
+	# The atomic and other branches should not be created upstream.
 	test_must_fail git -C "$d" show-ref --verify refs/heads/atomic &&
 	test_must_fail git -C "$d" show-ref --verify refs/heads/other &&