Re: Why is reflog so obscure?

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Thomas Guyot <tguyot@gmail.com> writes:

> Thanks for clarifying that - I suspected it since we can do
> <branch>@{<date>} although I didn't find any reference branch reflogs
> in the documentation. I could've missed it... Is there a way to read a 
> branch reflog?

    $ git reflog ;# lists entries of reflog of HEAD, starting at HEAD@{0}
    $ git reflog HEAD ;# same
    $ git reflog HEAD@{4} ;# same, starting at HEAD@{4}
    $ git reflog master ;# entries of reflog of "master"
    $ git reflog master@{0} ;# same
    $ git reflog master@{now} ;# same, show with timestamps
    $ git reflog master@{4.minutes} ;# same, starting at master@{4.minutes}

For the branch that is currently checked out, you can omit the name
when you use any of the @{...} notation, so 

    $ git reflog @{0}
    $ git reflog @{now}

are often the easiest ways to view what you did on the current
branch.