From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: test &&-chain lint
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:34:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqoannfu84.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150320172406.GA15172@peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:24:07 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Your case above is actually better spelled as test_expect_code, but
> there are more complex one-off cases that I solved using a {} block.
Just for the record, test_expect_code expects only one possible good
exit status and it does not allow us to say "0 is OK and 1 is also
OK, everything else is bad", so it is not quite appropriate there.
> ...
> So I dunno. I think "set -e" is kind of a dangerous lure.
Yes, I think we should stay away from it. &&-chaining is simpler to
see what is going on, even though it is a bit more to type.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 7:27 [PATCH 0/5] not making corruption worse Jeff King
2015-03-17 7:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository Jeff King
2015-03-17 18:34 ` Johannes Sixt
2015-03-17 18:55 ` Jeff King
2015-03-18 20:42 ` Johannes Sixt
2015-03-19 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-19 20:51 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-19 21:47 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 21:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-19 21:52 ` Jeff King
2015-03-20 1:16 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-03-20 1:32 ` Jeff King
2015-03-20 1:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-03-20 2:08 ` test &&-chain lint (was: [PATCH 1/5] t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository) Jeff King
2015-03-20 2:25 ` Jeff King
2015-03-20 5:10 ` Jeff King
2015-03-20 7:18 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-03-20 6:51 ` test &&-chain lint Junio C Hamano
2015-03-20 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-20 17:24 ` Jeff King
2015-03-20 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-03-20 17:59 ` Jeff King
2015-03-17 7:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] refs: introduce a "ref paranoia" flag Jeff King
2015-03-19 20:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-19 21:00 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-19 21:51 ` Jeff King
2015-03-17 7:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] prune: turn on ref_paranoia flag Jeff King
2015-03-17 7:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] repack: turn on "ref paranoia" when doing a destructive repack Jeff King
2015-03-17 7:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] refs.c: drop curate_packed_refs Jeff King
2015-03-20 1:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-03-17 7:37 ` [PATCH 0/5] not making corruption worse Jeff King
2015-03-17 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-18 10:21 ` Jeff King
2015-03-20 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2015-03-20 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository Jeff King
2015-03-20 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] refs: introduce a "ref paranoia" flag Jeff King
2015-03-20 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] prune: turn on ref_paranoia flag Jeff King
2015-03-20 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] repack: turn on "ref paranoia" when doing a destructive repack Jeff King
2015-03-20 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] refs.c: drop curate_packed_refs Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqoannfu84.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.