Re: [PATCH] cat-file: add short option '-c' for 'cat-file --textconv'

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/git-cat-file.txt |  5 +++--
>  builtin/cat-file.c             |  4 ++--
>  t/t8007-cat-file-textconv.sh   | 10 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt b/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
> index f6a16f4..b346a5d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
> @@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ git-cat-file - Provide content or type and size information for repository objec
>  SYNOPSIS
>  --------
>  [verse]
> -'git cat-file' (-t | -s | -e | -p | <type> | --textconv ) <object>
> +'git cat-file' (-t | -s | -e | -p | <type> | (-c | --textconv) ) <object>

Do we use "-c" for a shorthand for "--textconv" anywhere else?

Is there any other command that has "--textconv" where "-c" does not
mean "--textconv"?  Or worse yet, where "-c" already means something
completely different from "--textconv"?

Unlike end-user facing Porcelain commands, plumbing commands are
primarily meant to be used in scripts, and I am not sure how much
benefit we are getting by introducing new short options to them.

Ancient plumbing commands do have many single-letter options but
they were added back when more modern set of end-user facing
Porcelain commands did not exist.