From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: adjust permissions for gnupg 2.1 Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:45:33 -0800 Message-ID: References: <547DB6C3.5010704@drmicha.warpmail.net> <9c28f16c677bbc774e5b8dfc79b6ffe2c55d1720.1417527514.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20141202210753.GD23461@peff.net> <547EF2B8.3020106@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 03 17:45:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwD3f-0006Qh-Uu for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:45:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751576AbaLCQpk (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:45:40 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:63321 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbaLCQpj (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:45:39 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628521175; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:45:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cecgOrUaOiEx15nbu+AObByVIdk=; b=v4AyXp 6Ypq8llIzja1C2kDqzTInCCwMLsdGneW5HH7yYWq3zeRjQ+9QJQ4iwNE3kEndDw4 o7qnaLu/iDDR81WeqQXeu8nspTK0us91X6FUcubfirBjQUg1GtU4SUL9XOj7Kdgz 2fMD2wTY55VMhcNEu0NyQUum9aSj8EjqSN5aI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LcLSzRnZjS0atC8nxjED4u4SX9IhcPQE VIHZ/XTUonOu0iNRC2KhbXbxv66ZPjL+c3zYHITgvUHhaXoxzfBHyQ1Iq0WzJNd6 +TkwDHCLF9POwS0lcOuyEbYqMfxHqD9/gcZpBElnCeTovn0vJ0lYpLxlxBn4LZ5m YJ+gKFckLBo= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E57221174; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:45:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58EEA21171; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:45:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <547EF2B8.3020106@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:23:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CDB11072-7B0B-11E4-AF9D-42529F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > Orthogonal to that is the pinentry issue: I haven't checked whether > gpg2.1 asking for passphrases on passphrase-less secure keys is to be > fixed on the gpg side. If yes, I would just wait for that since gpg2.1 > is not common yet. > > If not, we should provide (in gpg config) an alternative pinentry that > just returns an empty passphrase without bugging the user. Sounds like a sensible plan to me. Thanks.