From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] gitweb: Return plain booleans in validation methods Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 12:01:55 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1386164583-14109-1-git-send-email-krzesimir@endocode.com> <1386164583-14109-4-git-send-email-krzesimir@endocode.com> <1386235422.2186.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Krzesimir Nowak , git , Eric Sunshine To: Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 05 21:02:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vof7a-0004HD-Ub for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:02:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752685Ab3LEUB7 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:59 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:59434 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751725Ab3LEUB6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:58 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2A4586F4; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:58 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=HWdtN1lkI7o1 ryAF284vW8741Ms=; b=fC5LmzF4GXgp7YZmTtEb6B6Tt2dID7oJGysG58Ayewd3 r1UvkfwMA4bY/V/1gm1j6WGlbZAhgsvtzrAgS7YixnUOIWea4HyYCE6C5rLG/UQC 5yd5+L2HPFCS7FKEnasWtgsQlyUOq30FufGAIAukO6V3xUu2jwgoKC1dcCm1Lao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nn+XKO oROClQePFqFyeeDzP5SVwawUAASPDLrC6UIPzfbrR2PK1jg+fcj0wCprvEZxK8t4 sqiIpO4i729ik1q3jxzPg3f8Dx9wviaiFuKLT+bnt0j/x5Kdjf4z3wvlYz6HewWj IFfZ7WN3Mp7h6YmySs6+8IiPVhWpEfPqogyfQ= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A554586F2; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D8E6586F0; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski=22's?= message of "Thu, 5 Dec 2013 20:11:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 185525BA-5DE8-11E3-9057-1B26802839F8-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Nar=C4=99bski writes: > But I am not against "return 0;" on validation error (would putting > it in separate patch make review easier, or just pointlessly prolifer= ate > patches?). OK.