All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Øystein Walle" <oystwa@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  phillip.wood123@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rebase: write script before initializing state
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:25:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqple6zaga.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711203615.9982-1-oystwa@gmail.com> ("Øystein Walle"'s message of "Fri, 11 Jul 2025 22:36:15 +0200")

Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com> writes:

> If rebase.instructionFormat is invalid the repository is left in a
> strange state when the interactive rebase fails. `git status` outputs
> both the same as it would have in the normal case *and* something
> related to the interactive rebase:
>
>     $ git -c rebase.instructionFormat=blah rebase -i
>     fatal: invalid --pretty format: blah
>     $ git status
>     On branch master
>     Your branch is ahead of 'upstream/master' by 1 commit.
>       (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
>
>     git-rebase-todo is missing.
>     No commands done.
>     No commands remaining.
>     You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch 'master' on '8db3019401'.
>       (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
>       (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
>
> get_commit_format() calls die() on failure so we cannot handle the error
> gracefully. By attempting to write the rebase script before initializing
> the state this bad state can be avoided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
> ---
> So sorry for the delay. I saw that the signoff was missing, then saw
> Phillip's review, decided to think about it and then life happened in
> the mean time...

No need to be sorry.  Life happens, indeed.

> This patch is identical to the first one except it has the missing
> signoff and a few typos in the commit message corrected. Phillip's
> suggestions are noted and appreciated but unfortunately I am unable to
> work on the at the moment. And I do think my patch is at least an
> improvement albeit perhaps less thorough than it could have been.

Well, as long as we are making a step in the right direction, such a
partial improvement gives us a better foundation for somebody else
to further build on.  It does not look like that this patch would
make it harder to later give us a more thorough solution.

Thanks for working on the topic.

>  builtin/rebase.c             | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh | 10 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index 2e8c4ee678..8139816417 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -293,15 +293,6 @@ static int do_interactive_rebase(struct rebase_options *opts, unsigned flags)
>  				&revisions, &shortrevisions))
>  		goto cleanup;
>  
> -	if (init_basic_state(&replay,
> -			     opts->head_name ? opts->head_name : "detached HEAD",
> -			     opts->onto, &opts->orig_head->object.oid))
> -		goto cleanup;
> -
> -	if (!opts->upstream && opts->squash_onto)
> -		write_file(path_squash_onto(), "%s\n",
> -			   oid_to_hex(opts->squash_onto));
> -
>  	strvec_pushl(&make_script_args, "", revisions, NULL);
>  	if (opts->restrict_revision)
>  		strvec_pushf(&make_script_args, "^%s",
> @@ -310,21 +301,30 @@ static int do_interactive_rebase(struct rebase_options *opts, unsigned flags)
>  	ret = sequencer_make_script(the_repository, &todo_list.buf,
>  				    make_script_args.nr, make_script_args.v,
>  				    flags);
> -
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
>  		error(_("could not generate todo list"));
> -	else {
> -		discard_index(the_repository->index);
> -		if (todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(the_repository, &replay,
> -						todo_list.buf.buf, &todo_list))
> -			BUG("unusable todo list");
> -
> -		ret = complete_action(the_repository, &replay, flags,
> -			shortrevisions, opts->onto_name, opts->onto,
> -			&opts->orig_head->object.oid, &opts->exec,
> -			opts->autosquash, opts->update_refs, &todo_list);
> +		goto cleanup;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (init_basic_state(&replay,
> +			     opts->head_name ? opts->head_name : "detached HEAD",
> +			     opts->onto, &opts->orig_head->object.oid))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	if (!opts->upstream && opts->squash_onto)
> +		write_file(path_squash_onto(), "%s\n",
> +			   oid_to_hex(opts->squash_onto));
> +
> +	discard_index(the_repository->index);
> +	if (todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(the_repository, &replay,
> +					todo_list.buf.buf, &todo_list))
> +		BUG("unusable todo list");
> +
> +	ret = complete_action(the_repository, &replay, flags,
> +		shortrevisions, opts->onto_name, opts->onto,
> +		&opts->orig_head->object.oid, &opts->exec,
> +		opts->autosquash, opts->update_refs, &todo_list);
> +
>  cleanup:
>  	replay_opts_release(&replay);
>  	free(revisions);
> diff --git a/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh b/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh
> index 26b42a526a..5d093e3a7a 100755
> --- a/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh
> +++ b/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh
> @@ -394,6 +394,16 @@ test_expect_success 'autosquash with empty custom instructionFormat' '
>  	)
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'autosquash with invalid custom instructionFormat' '
> +	git reset --hard base &&
> +	test_commit invalid-instructionFormat-test &&
> +	(
> +		test_must_fail git -c rebase.instructionFormat=blah \
> +			rebase --autosquash  --force-rebase -i HEAD^ &&
> +		test_path_is_missing .git/rebase-merge
> +	)
> +'
> +
>  set_backup_editor () {
>  	write_script backup-editor.sh <<-\EOF
>  	cp "$1" .git/backup-"$(basename "$1")"

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-09 22:10 [PATCH] rebase: write script before initializing state Øystein Walle
2025-06-09 23:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-10 10:13 ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-09  0:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 20:36   ` [PATCH v2] " Øystein Walle
2025-07-11 21:25     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-07-24 14:22       ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-23 21:34     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqple6zaga.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oystwa@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.