From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Clarify what git-rebase's "--preserve-merges" does Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:03:52 -0700 Message-ID: References: <871tkblapv.fsf@javad.com> <55147D27.1060204@kdbg.org> <87lhidlebw.fsf@javad.com> <87vbhgks0v.fsf@javad.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Johannes Sixt , Sebastian Schuberth , Git Mailing List To: Sergey Organov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 01 19:04:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdM3d-000865-2N for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:04:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753041AbbDARD4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:03:56 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:58830 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753026AbbDARDz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:03:55 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D61643D13; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=U9/o45kOPpJu94Lt8U1nRARF7QY=; b=VLUMKx y+QkbeHfNOEJ66Hav8fu7N6pUCg5F/BoeZEtEFXBn3Ru/I2+QnNp+0vCODspft56 3jVQdTWbo5su8fwKF920LFbAi9nBMmw/2IwguePZnRFV7AXzlITUyoXfBDwDptXO iCVZOPJMC0b2sQn5o6/9ArGVaDnkKtAYCc1ls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=M3kFNY7hArZS5eti4ARbvwDGdrUstjpp tGXcUsByAr0Urg4mojUxx6zq83SxsFNhKFf0YPWzy14dTmPc9Ny8d+4JlJwlCtRF tunJS17hxnbYEgvhIeoiyN/H/mqEAcwOlXo4UUS7INl+U/gfVtFWWuud9wJGldrx PSmzHfAjyAo= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7530643D12; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E313E43D0E; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:03:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87vbhgks0v.fsf@javad.com> (Sergey Organov's message of "Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:27:28 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 13A63B92-D891-11E4-BB99-11859F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sergey Organov writes: > Nope. It seems like cherry-pick takes care of that: > ... > What do I miss? The fact that cherry-pick did not flag it as a potential conflict situation where a manual verification is required (the cherry-pick process can be fooled by textual similarity and either add the same thing twice or fail to add one thing that is needed).