From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement @{publish} shorthand Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:52:55 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20140108093338.GA15659@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140108093716.GE15720@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140124213521.GA26602@sigill.intra.peff.net> <9D08338A41454F778D03FB2E9F4B7DD1@PhilipOakley> <20140218085224.GB2692@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Philip Oakley , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 18 20:53:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFqj3-0007ad-85 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:53:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751032AbaBRTxA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:53:00 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:55223 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbaBRTw7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065C76D862; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:59 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=rGTcUElMiQs9lKHyWgu4qji1TZU=; b=ly6Qr2 hU7PeGbntKZTqvt1krKEBpo5FjobbwoLHevKxbCiXlCPnME4fmMJHV/Z+a7sDdeK PnfnrFQoYXibE0qeFbhKSbLcMr3fm2p9gKKfP6L17qCItcJbRjbUTHM096s6aRj9 ukfjL39lILCL8F0yFxUKC8SEtrjG1aB/s94+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mTE6AgOwm7nIquD/nBmRAjStCyRl6agi +ClH14WCWRoIkOJ3E9UV11fV+ChAzN2SwyHSl8odFKUknBxX4Ns8o66CUJL0D+SB CWLWYKG2/g0utIH73YBpE6ABrGb4sVM4pTnL5EykMFTihTI/N645PHQzTvYiSyll 8ChY+oegpv0= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5526D861; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6151C6D85D; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20140218085224.GB2692@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:52:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 437F267C-98D6-11E3-9EE1-1B26802839F8-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > In that sense, "publish" is not the best word, either, as it describes > only the first two, but not the third case (and those are just examples; > there may be other setups beyond that, even). > > Perhaps "@{push}" would be the most direct word. Hmph, then the other one would be @{pull}. Which does not sound too bad, IMHO.