All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,  Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	 Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 13:24:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr0ho55ni.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cSJz3U+vT==NhX5hcrTjsCggnAzhzQOvZcSXbcEGuYaKQ@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:24:59 -0500")

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:

>> diff --git a/t/t4301-merge-tree-write-tree.sh b/t/t4301-merge-tree-write-tree.sh
>> @@ -961,4 +961,18 @@ test_expect_success 'error out on missing tree objects' '
>> +test_expect_success 'error out on missing blob objects' '
>> +       seq1=$(test_seq 1 10 | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>> +       seq2=$(test_seq 1 11 | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>> +       seq3=$(test_seq 0 10 | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>
> Is there significance to the ranges passed to test_seq()? Or, can the
> same be achieved by using arbitrary content for each blob?
>
>     blob1=$(echo "one" | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>     blob2=$(echo "two" | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>     blob3=$(echo "three" | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>
>> +       tree1=$(printf "100644 blob %s\tsequence" $seq1 | git mktree) &&
>> +       tree2=$(printf "100644 blob %s\tsequence" $seq2 | git mktree) &&
>> +       tree3=$(printf "100644 blob %s\tsequence" $seq3 | git mktree) &&
>
> I found the lack of terminating "\n" in the `printf` confusing,
> especially since the variable names (seq1, seq2, etc.) and the use of
> `printf` seem to imply, at first glance, that each git-mktree
> invocation is receiving multiple lines as input which, it turns out,
> is not the case. Adding the missing "\n" would help:
>
>    tree1=$(printf "100644 blob %s\tsequence\n" $seq1 | git mktree) &&
>    tree2=$(printf "100644 blob %s\tsequence\n" $seq2 | git mktree) &&
>    tree3=$(printf "100644 blob %s\tsequence\n" $seq3 | git mktree) &&
>
> Interpolating the $seqN variable directly into the string rather than
> using %s would make it even clearer that only a single line is being
> generated as input to git-mktree:
>
>    tree1=$(printf "100644 blob $seq1\tsequence\n" | git mktree) &&
>    tree2=$(printf "100644 blob $seq2\tsequence\n" | git mktree) &&
>    tree3=$(printf "100644 blob $seq3\tsequence\n" | git mktree) &&

All good points.  Thanks for excellent reviews (not just this one
but another one in the series).

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-07 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06  9:49 [PATCH 0/4] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07  7:42   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-06 22:07   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-07  7:42   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 21:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Junio C Hamano
2024-02-07  7:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-07 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:47   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:02     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-22 14:09       ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-07 16:47   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:47   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:24     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-07 21:24       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-02-08  0:52       ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-22 14:12       ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-07 16:47   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:26     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-22 14:08       ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-22 17:05         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-07 16:47   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 14:36     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:13       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:18       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:27       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 18:23         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 17:58       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-23  8:33         ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-02-23 17:17           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-22 14:36     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-22 18:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-23  8:34     ` [PATCH v4 0/6] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23  8:34       ` [PATCH v4 1/6] merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23  8:34       ` [PATCH v4 2/6] merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23  8:34       ` [PATCH v4 3/6] t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23  8:34       ` [PATCH v4 4/6] Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23  8:34       ` [PATCH v4 5/6] cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23  8:34       ` [PATCH v4 6/6] fill_tree_descriptor(): mark error message for translation Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-02-23 18:23       ` [PATCH v4 0/6] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqr0ho55ni.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.