From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] builtin add -p: fix hunk splitting
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:02:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr193j8y4.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 47e7b23a-56a3-b533-63ed-a854503b59ed@gmail.com
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> Even if the helper is finalizing the current hunk then I think that
> "nonsense" hunk would still wrong as it would be calling
> finalize_hunk() on _every_ context line in the hunk rather than just
> being called once to finalize the hunk.
True; this triggers every time we finish reading the common context
lines and not at the end of hunk. In any case, I think what we
queued looks good for 'next'.
>> - if ((marker == '-' || marker == '+') && *p == ' ')
>> - hunk->splittable_into++;
>> + if (*p == ' ')
>> + complete_file(marker, &hunk->splittable_into);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 14:32 [PATCH 0/2] builtin add -p: fix hunk splitting Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-12-20 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] t3701: clean up hunk splitting tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-12-20 21:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-20 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin add -p: fix hunk splitting Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-12-20 19:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-11 11:13 ` Phillip Wood
2022-01-11 11:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-20 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-01-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t3701: clean up hunk splitting tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-01-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] builtin add -p: fix hunk splitting Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-01-11 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-11 18:57 ` Phillip Wood
2022-01-12 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-19 20:01 ` Phillip Wood
2022-01-20 5:02 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-01-20 8:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-20 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-22 9:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-24 11:10 ` Phillip Wood
2022-01-12 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqr193j8y4.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.