From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: John Cai via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 11:47:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr19mhsmz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16666d32-833a-f3d7-351a-eeef7f25b002@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:15:57 +0000")
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
>> @@ -613,8 +622,8 @@ int cmd_name_rev(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>> for_each_ref(name_ref, &data);
>> name_tips();
>> - if (transform_stdin) {
>> - char buffer[2048];
>> + if (annotate_stdin) {
>> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
>
> I think this hunk belongs in the next patch. Before posting a patch
> series I find it helpful to run
>
> git rebase --keep-base -x'make -j4 git && cd t && prove -j4 <tests
> I think might fail> :: --root=/dev/shm'
>
> to check that the individual patches compile and pass the relevant
> tests. I've never got round to trying it but git-test[1] also lets you
> test all the commits in a series
Ahh, I saw and pointed out exactly the same mistake in an earlier
round, but failed to spot it this time around. Thanks for spotting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-26 4:28 [PATCH] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-text John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-27 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-28 5:13 ` John Cai
2021-12-31 8:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-01 22:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-12-29 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --anotate-text John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-29 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-text John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-30 22:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-29 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] name-rev.c: use strbuf_getline instead of limited size buffer John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-03 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-03 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-text John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-04 2:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 3:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 13:25 ` Philip Oakley
2022-01-04 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 19:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-03 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] name-rev.c: use strbuf_getline instead of limited size buffer John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-04 2:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-04 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-04 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-05 11:15 ` Phillip Wood
2022-01-05 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-01-05 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] name-rev.c: use strbuf_getline instead of limited size buffer John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-04 14:54 ` John Cai
2022-01-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] name-rev.c: use strbuf_getline instead of limited size buffer John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 23:00 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] name-rev.c: use strbuf_getline instead of limited size buffer John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 23:12 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin Junio C Hamano
2022-01-05 23:29 ` [PATCH v7 " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 23:29 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-08 13:47 ` John Cai
2022-01-10 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-10 19:01 ` John Cai
2022-01-10 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-11 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2022-01-05 23:29 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] name-rev.c: use strbuf_getline instead of limited size buffer John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-18 16:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqr19mhsmz.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.