All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blame.c: prepare_lines should not call xrealloc for every line
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:44:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr47i7dt4.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874n4ewouz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 04 Feb 2014 22:27:00 +0100")

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> Ok, I now wrote
>
> 	for (p = buf;; num++, p++) {
> 		p = memchr(p, '\n', end - p);
> 		if (!p)
> 			break;
> 	}

Looks still wrong (perhaps this is a taste issue).

	num++ is not "loop control", but the real action of this
	loop to count lines.  It is better left inside.

	p++ is "loop control", and belongs to the third part of
	for(;;).

	Isn't the normal continuation condition "p < end"?

so something like

	for (p = buf; p < end; p++) {
        	p = find the end of this line
                if (!p)
                	break;
		num++;
	}

perhaps?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-04 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-04 20:06 [PATCH] blame.c: prepare_lines should not call xrealloc for every line David Kastrup
2014-02-04 20:10 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 20:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:09       ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 22:28         ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-04 22:48           ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-04 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 20:52   ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:11       ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:41         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:27   ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:44     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-02-04 21:48       ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 22:06         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-05  8:39           ` David Kastrup
2014-02-05 20:39             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-06  0:34               ` David Kastrup
2014-02-06 10:29               ` David Kastrup
2014-02-05  9:22   ` David Kastrup
2014-02-05 20:34     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-05 23:45       ` David Kastrup
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-04 21:40 David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:46 David Kastrup
2014-02-12 14:27 David Kastrup
2014-02-12 19:36 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqr47i7dt4.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.