From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2013, #05; Thu, 21) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:25 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20131122102345.GC12042@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jeff King , git To: Vicent =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=AD?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 22 21:05:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjwyu-0003Y7-BW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:05:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755933Ab3KVUFc convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:05:32 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:39572 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755723Ab3KVUFb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:05:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD8854D72; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:05:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=e9UY+LDlyn3a pu2pvE2VAbO3bP8=; b=a5HGdzXp67OZiqaD7whQHTh4p4nKm7kv1GfF4ESplJET ih1BmxTZEiwYVe8LIKRZk+LBCUZr+AS0DpCQ9Zmr3hXonOwOuqaH8yLuYV56n17y fmjWr7/4qKzqBKoFQPCRpYcgTPm0cLlohwDzGSpFb8ViVgO3ukhqvdZc3Vhv5GI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=f2JHu4 qqC0TIgWNzt5P7hkR/TYW6CXI1GZsgDckpsag+v2fVdgKMEjJvzHuFynYXiH8Mu6 CafT++piKQFK+iU1SOEpcq9E+ynGMONibe9cd5LSADEr2U+1N2IxME5kBRUKZFZc 5eB4shb3qXSROQbTvTuYUQ5qCPyEW08cCJ8+c= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C7454D70; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:05:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A98354D6F; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:05:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("Vicent =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=AD=22's?= message of "Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:47:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6EC23A82-53B1-11E3-A9BB-D331802839F8-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Vicent Mart=C3=AD writes: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Junio C Hamano w= rote: > > We are running a slightly older version of the patchset, because we'r= e > still on 1.8.4 and the current reroll doesn't apply cleanly there. > > If this could make it to `next` some time next week, that would work > out great for us, because we may start considering using `next` as a > partial or full deployment on our production machines I do not think potentially incompatible stuff that are slated for 2.0 that have been cooking in 'next' affects the server side, so that may be a good and safe move. > This also means that we could exercise the patchset and everything > else that is queued up in next release... There is no 'next release' though; there is no guarantee what is cooking in 'next' will be in any future release ;-). In any case, it is nice to see that people from a large hosting site finally taking a hint from my occasional light complaints that come after "thanks for reporting" whenever I see regression and breakage report soon after a topic graduates to 'master' ;-). It is good to see that more people starting to adopt the 'next' branch early for wider testing. Thanks.