From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB091DE4CD for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 13:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759411988; cv=none; b=MStsnnZhs6DC6cmSRfeSUcx0zMpNaEi9vFlpPnUB2YthGXszSSCQ2C3ez/fnByg3OAWgV1uHczIkqRQFLfcMX9hVildxXCx7FBIkAEoTJ8Co86SAUS+q4OLPgIOG6l2JZLeHaMrPjGfjauNci6k1CQU+wKh6Gj5pzeH5Nzve1l4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759411988; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RFqnkllIAc7p4weC5HjlKXll5x5X/3d0qDbpVogk/sA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nPa10R0im+jzZia6xTabYMTkmOQUwQjU56pZhUFexo6bRN/KTb2aaAHiCGyp+eBc1ph6s0BCrQ8pTCElBFqy9eAnNFbBy+6pAaKweqvMHqCrLsrXtsoZBWQpGnPxgtzQLhOjad+n3EwwVxUKToR8+T+kogPTliuTEbVbQGPCfoM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=XfGNm6gD; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ZlcLFiAm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="XfGNm6gD"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ZlcLFiAm" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E37C1D0012B; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:33:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Oct 2025 09:33:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1759411984; x=1759498384; bh=LaL5gGcXOio9Asly8sbPuCy1A8IoOumv2m9P/cEgwck=; b= XfGNm6gDrbmXobhDAG5xxh7FbWBnnYOT1FNhn5ABdbwCrnwqkCRXCX0/v012Gp9f MhoCNh6yxja8/aNq/vsmXj635w38UkycT3rKf+UULvrhzBa204Pt8V+/0QrNfRh8 d3PYp1zTJ7d6s1GjsLaFnDIsmdviYOnj/BI5Y/1/15/8fscsen+JN7cFDh8SG3QZ Ay4lb1NXHDT0s4MvBMHfmIWOfnQ/1mdYrMc/wovwp4PEwTLfQf8FxYWWFK611wv+ Hqt+8H5wkKVWE11DliUwj+cPD+8HwgKxPQe1fdLR4FEvjZHxOKfktrMvZKDsoCoz /dTBrCEVzBBtjq0s5Drwhw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1759411984; x= 1759498384; bh=LaL5gGcXOio9Asly8sbPuCy1A8IoOumv2m9P/cEgwck=; b=Z lcLFiAmclNO3/xs6eqeEttIXvo0Ujmcer+MrTXmR+Z5Fnrclov/DqWo0RztrASbZ mndBq0wI146Rt4e9dbDr7PSVG82lBlQzTyQ86f9mYFIdl3cNeVSkJavUq1Qxb3+Q WFYieX6m8nPxqOgeKHkW2CZ5SwdmPbt9E3jXONYr7+atzYIf4/TA8UhLsbx+obq1 pSl7X70ng0bUKPnUoK3TJkT4NdYpnR/MVeaO7WYEinbq7DmvJX3fblJ18NtUFD4T Zj8kf+I9Xmxs7OsSsW3gDOm+7tFvsyDu8l64y7Kx6i24nWhdqP/nVtkgC3C52eHU IwQTzYwVUPZihOYhej9Lg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdekieduhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtgfesthekredttderjeenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptdffvdetgedvtdekteefveeuveelgfekfeehiefgheevhedvkeehleevveef tdehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepkedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepmhhsuhgthhgrnhgvkhesshhushgvrdguvgdprhgtph htthhopehsuhhnshhhihhnvgesshhunhhshhhinhgvtghordgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohep shhorhhgrghnohhvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsggvnhdrkhhnohgslh gvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhgrshhonhduudgthhhotggrsehprhho thhonhdrmhgvpdhrtghpthhtohepjhgtuhgsihgtsehjtghusghitgdrphhlpdhrtghpth htohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshht vghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:33:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michal =?utf-8?Q?Such=C3=A1nek?= Cc: Eric Sunshine , Sergey Organov , Ben Knoble , Jason Cho , "Jakub T. Jankiewicz" , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What is the reason behind not hiding git worktrees from git? In-Reply-To: ("Michal =?utf-8?Q?Such?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A1nek=22's?= message of "Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:38:48 +0200") References: <875xcyfk3k.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 06:33:02 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Michal Suchánek writes: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 03:27:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Eric Sunshine writes: >> >> > skip over them when scanning the output. Moreover, I think this is the >> > first time that we have (on the list, at least) heard a complaint >> > about the "noise", which may suggest that this is a non-issue for most >> > people, and that a warning telling people to avoid the practice would >> > be unwelcome. >> >> Ah, different people guess different reasons out of the same >> observation. My interpretation of this is the first time about the >> complaint on "noise" was because everybody else would not even have >> additional worktree in-tree. > > I suppose a suggestion about not adding worktree in-tree in the add > command description would be helpful to avoid the problem. > > That's the part I would read if I wanted to learn about adding > worktrees, and it has none of those examples you mention. Yeah, care to throw a patch or two at the documentation to help our users and us? Thanks.