From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, peff@peff.net,
me@ttaylorr.com, johncai86@gmail.com, newren@gmail.com,
christian.couder@gmail.com, kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com,
jonathantanmy@google.com, karthik.188@gmail.com,
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PATH WALK III: Add 'git backfill' command
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:37:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsephhxs0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4jY2Bj-e8i9Zuig@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:00:56 +0100")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> I was wondering whether we might want to mark the new command as
> experimental at first to allow us to iterate, but the last set of
> commands where we have done so are still experimental many years after
> they have been introduced. So... probably not a good idea.
I am not sure if I agree. Anybody who wants any of these commands
that are marked as experimental to be declared stable can propose
to do so with a reasonable timeline attached.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 20:07 [PATCH 0/5] PATH WALK III: Add 'git backfill' command Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-06 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] backfill: add builtin boilerplate Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-01-16 10:11 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-16 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-03 14:38 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-12-06 20:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] backfill: basic functionality and tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-16 8:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-18 15:03 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-12-06 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] backfill: add --batch-size=<n> option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-16 8:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-18 15:09 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-01-19 17:57 ` Jean-Noël AVILA
2024-12-06 20:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] backfill: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-16 8:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-06 20:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] backfill: assume --sparse when sparse-checkout is enabled Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] PATH WALK III: Add 'git backfill' command Junio C Hamano
2024-12-09 0:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] backfill: add builtin boilerplate Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-12-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] backfill: basic functionality and tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-01-16 10:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 14:44 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-12-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] backfill: add --min-batch-size=<n> option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-01-16 10:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] backfill: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-01-16 10:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 15:11 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-12-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] backfill: assume --sparse when sparse-checkout is enabled Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-01-16 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PATH WALK III: Add 'git backfill' command Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-17 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-02-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v3 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-02-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] backfill: add builtin boilerplate Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-02-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] backfill: basic functionality and tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-02-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] backfill: add --min-batch-size=<n> option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-02-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] backfill: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-02-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] backfill: assume --sparse when sparse-checkout is enabled Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-02-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] PATH WALK III: Add 'git backfill' command Junio C Hamano
2025-02-05 7:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-05 17:07 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsephhxs0.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.