All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthias Buehlmann <Matthias.Buehlmann@mabulous.com>,
	Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: Bug Report: Multi-line trailers containing empty lines break parsing
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:39:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsg4l3h32.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD1QG_b6ax-HodLRRcdLKgWJhPDghjLfjnyan1Zi80en7A@mail.gmail.com> (Christian Couder's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:17:46 +0100")

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

> So I thought that blank lines should not appear in the trailers. And
> if any appears, it means that the trailers should start after the last
> blank line.

I think that is a good principle to stick to.

>> >  - if the second "multi:" trailer did not have the funny blank line
>> >    before "_two", the expected output would still be "multi:"
>> >    followed by "one two three", iow, the line after the second
>> >    "multi: one" is a total no-op?  If we added many more " \n" lines
>> >    there, they are all absorbed and ignored?  It somehow feels wrong
>>
>> That's definitely the outcome of this patch, but I agree it feels wrong.
>> I'm not sure that we define the behavior that strictly in
>> git-interpret-trailers(1), so we have some wiggle room, I guess.
>
> Any patch to relax how blank lines and other aspects of trailers
> parsing in my opinion should come with some documentation change to
> explain what we now accept and what we don't accept, and also tests to
> enforce that.

OK.  But do we document clearly what we accept and we don't before
any change?


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-15 21:54 Bug Report: Multi-line trailers containing empty lines break parsing Matthias Buehlmann
2021-02-16  2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-16 18:07   ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-16 19:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-16 19:47       ` Taylor Blau
2021-03-23 15:17         ` Christian Couder
2021-03-23 17:39           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-03-25  7:53             ` Christian Couder
2021-03-25  9:33               ` ZheNing Hu
2021-03-25 18:16                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-26 10:25                   ` ZheNing Hu
2021-03-25 18:08               ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqsg4l3h32.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Matthias.Buehlmann@mabulous.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.