From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B09120323 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751951AbdCVVRP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:17:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59901 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751886AbdCVVRH (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:17:07 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBFA7C6FC; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:17:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qwa7Rrfdgkw+qP5jM86cdwncAM0=; b=PtrSwW BvJQ1XqVo2D/U3IUiNbkb2ec7qm6fo1w9zff6IDMEHYb1RyK9XxzBEmL4oqVL24T JqcatIsNR973RU9Uvi8RDHv/kgalD9V1OaRxfrFfhQmMJcFsp+4YmPxB8hdqg7IX nIY3q0yBjZii8hTpCWarAvDqKMT30JDSvAktE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XC0cuKjwHZOdb0kFk+FUzdTV/7deij9a BzClIwBkktdKBDs+HcYgsbPYXEPoFNi79/07Pyxp0b77YcoaOtbh/d+0qmdxXQsb YukpLlPvmw7enhmX7iOan51E/ICidOLrl7ob7GSQ1rdLtTHtYBRWZSLshshgv7ED wdSR4U4GgvA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53DB7C6FB; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:17:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A0D07C6FA; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:17:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Brandon Williams Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] push options across http References: <20170322195102.165314-1-bmwill@google.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:17:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170322195102.165314-1-bmwill@google.com> (Brandon Williams's message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:51:00 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E648D05A-0F44-11E7-B398-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Brandon Williams writes: > This series enables push options to be sent across http using remote-curl > > Thanks to Jonathan Nieder for helping troubleshoot. > > Brandon Williams (2): > send-pack: send push options correctly in stateless-rpc case > remote-curl: allow push options Thanks. Why does the topic name sound familiar to me? Did we have a recent attempt to do the same that didn't work well or something? > > builtin/send-pack.c | 5 +++++ > remote-curl.c | 8 ++++++++ > send-pack.c | 20 ++++++++------------ > t/t5545-push-options.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)