Re: [PATCH for-maint] apply: gitdiff_verify_name(): accept "/dev/null\r"

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> writes:

> On 09/23/14 20:54, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> SMTP transport may be CRLF-unsafe, so I have a suspicion that it may
>> turn out that what you are trying to do might be an equilvalent of
>> 
>> 	git format-patch ... |
>>         # first lose all \r\n
>>         dos2unix | 
>> 	# then make everything \r\n
>>         unix2dos |
>>         # and apply
>>         git am
>> 
>> which is not workable in the first place.  I dunno.
>
> I agree with your analysis. It is indeed the MTA...
>>    - CR and LF MUST only occur together as CRLF; they MUST NOT appear
>>      independently in the body.
>
> But why is this situation "not workable"? The same happens with *all*
> patches that people mail around, it's just not visible to them, because
> git-am strips all CRs indiscriminately.

It is not "git am" or "git apply" that "strips all CRs
indiscriminately".  I just tried to apply 0001-add-f2 without
letting your MTA/MUA corrupt it on "master" branch in the repository
you prepared that patch from, i.e.

	git checkout master^0 ;# go back
        git am 0001-add-f2* ;# apply that "+hello world\r\n" patch
        git diff branch ;# nothing

> Another question I had about gitdiff_verify_name() -- what ensures there
> that the memcmp(), with the fixed size of 9 bytes,...

That may be worth fixing.