All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
	 Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
	 Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] config: let git_config_parse_key() validate quietly
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 23:08:22 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtsrlujah.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d938ebf95a817c00a415670c08b839747d711d29.1780407557.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:39:16 +0000")

"Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
>
> Add a "quiet" parameter that suppresses the error() calls, and let
> store_key be NULL to skip the canonical-copy allocation.  Existing
> callers pass 0 for quiet.

Hmph.

The way this patch did this may have been easier to implement, but
is a bit different from what I had in mind when I suggested to
"refactor" the existing logic.

Perhaps the updated "git_config_parse_key()" in this patch should be
renamed to be a file-scape static internal helper, and the existing
"git_config_parse_key()" should become a thin wrapper around that
new helper function, retaining the current external interface,
requiring no changes to existing callers.

Then in the next step, config.[ch] can add a new entry point that
serves the purpose of is_valid_key() in the previous iteration,
perhaps call it is_valid_git_config_key() or something like that
(Patrick or others may want to suggest a better word order in its
name).  That way, we do not have to sprinkle many calls into
this (rather ugly) version of git_config_parse_key() with overly
wide interface that repeats meaningless NULL/0/1 parameters that no
callers want to use (other than for the purpose of differenciating
the real git_config_parse_key() calls from the new calls made to the
same function to ask "is this a valid key or not, yes/no?".

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 13:58 [PATCH] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-14 21:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-14 22:16   ` [PATCH] fetch: add fetch.pruneLocalBranches config Harald Nordgren
2026-05-15  1:28     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-15  7:56       ` Email issues Harald Nordgren
2026-05-15 12:02         ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-05-15  9:39       ` [PATCH] fetch: add fetch.pruneLocalBranches config Harald Nordgren
2026-05-16 12:51   ` [PATCH] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren
2026-05-16 12:52 ` [PATCH v2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" in set context Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-25  8:33   ` [PATCH v3] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-25  9:15     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-26 19:21     ` [PATCH v4] config: improve diagnostic for "set" with missing value Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-26 19:24       ` Harald Nordgren
2026-06-01 23:45       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-01 23:53       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-02 13:39       ` [PATCH v5 0/2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 13:39         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] config: let git_config_parse_key() validate quietly Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 14:08           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-06-02 16:31             ` Harald Nordgren
2026-06-04  1:09               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-02 13:39         ` [PATCH v5 2/2] config: improve diagnostic for "set" with missing value Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 14:18           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-02 18:43         ` [PATCH v6 0/2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 18:43           ` [PATCH v6 1/2] config: add git_config_key_is_valid() for quiet validation Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 18:43           ` [PATCH v6 2/2] config: improve diagnostic for "set" with missing value Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-04  1:09           ` [PATCH v6 0/2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqtsrlujah.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.