Re: [PATCH 5/5] sparse-index: improve lstat caching of sparse paths

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

> ...  It'd simplify this particular call to
>
>     strbuf_add(&data->dir, rest, next_slash - rest + 1);
>
> or substitute any other variable name for "rest" there.  Maybe it
> shouldn't be a big deal, but ...

Good observation.  Naming is hard, but it often happens that a
temporary variable that is given an appropriate name improves the
readability of the code a lot.

> Anyway, despite the many small comments I made, well done!  I think
> the method is not only much more performant, but more readable than my
> original.  With a few small tweaks, it should be good to merge.

Yup, and your review was a delight to read.

Thanks, both.