From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2017, #02; Sun, 15)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:32:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtw8xe8bp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170117193639.mt3x3md3nbh2qgws@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:36:39 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> That was my general impression, too. But I seem to recall it was you in
> a nearby thread saying that:
>
> if (foo)
> bar();
> else {
> one();
> two();
> }
>
> was wrong. Maybe I misunderstood.
If it were a new code written like the above, that would have been
fine. If a new code written with both sides inside {}, that would
have been fine, too.
IIRC, it was that the original had {} on both, and a patch tried to
turn that into the above, triggering "why are we churning between
two acceptable forms?"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-16 1:51 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2017, #02; Sun, 15) Junio C Hamano
2017-01-16 6:56 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-16 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-16 12:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 16:04 ` Jeff King
2017-01-16 17:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 20:33 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-16 21:44 ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 19:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-18 6:50 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-18 19:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-19 16:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 22:00 ` Jeff King
2017-01-16 22:08 ` [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: clarify multi-line brace style Jeff King
2017-01-17 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17 20:05 ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17 1:33 ` What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2017, #02; Sun, 15) Jacob Keller
2017-01-17 7:52 ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 19:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17 19:36 ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-01-17 20:51 ` Jeff King
2017-01-16 11:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-17 19:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-18 13:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 11:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-18 1:05 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] unpack-trees: support super-prefix option Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtw8xe8bp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.