From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE812021E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 22:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754419AbcKIW56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:58 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58479 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753423AbcKIW55 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:57 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FF24D69A; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=v9UiFkPIM8dh1UQLbZ+aWPOE4BA=; b=Gja6/a tePi7ZKI1+uPtiSfRD26ooV020bw9I15CnsUjBMogbTlBxcoeInVcmAsid6ODOtP s6G05VmIeAZsJcETkGsI7MclZFkY7DbwmXtxzgiSQjSR+FM8GzqhQLqCgeR72ZoI R+xMVLJBZBiDeG4QnI5MH2Ro4YGfT8lwavoQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=IwY7mjG24egsfrNIm64L9E7LEqOaZIvK G/M7VYshSSppElMoVmMkkTBvsg+bOZ0fmdbt9XkgSA4DO4eN5YORjPXw+rsw8Rau tXVMVO1aoUSfSZOjeilWRL/Q3mX+IOyrsUQolEdAzbZov9Njn0EIZNJaAvnwkGyQ A1r70BXr6YQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4504D699; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4FD94D698; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:55 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Triplett Cc: Jacob Keller , Christian Couder , git , "Shawn O. Pierce" , Jeff King , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Mike Hommey Subject: Re: Regarding "git log" on "git series" metadata References: <20161105151836.wztypzrdywyltvrc@x> <20161105202553.migx75gfuujakqyk@x> <20161106163410.ilysej5r6qd3744e@x> <20161106173311.lqoxxgcklx4jlrg7@x> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:57:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161106173311.lqoxxgcklx4jlrg7@x> (Josh Triplett's message of "Sun, 6 Nov 2016 09:33:11 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F3A5BEC6-A6CF-11E6-95CA-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Josh Triplett writes: >> This would definitely need protocol extension when transferring >> objects across repositories. > > It'd also need a repository format extension locally. Otherwise, if you > ever touched that repository with an older git (or a tool built on an > older libgit2 or JGit or other library), you could lose data. True. Thanks for sanity-checking me.