From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Cc: "Phil Susi" <phillsusi@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
"Sebastian Schuberth" <sschuberth@gmail.com>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mergetools: add winmerge as a builtin tool
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:13:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtwv7m2hw.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432112843-973-2-git-send-email-davvid@gmail.com> (David Aguilar's message of "Wed, 20 May 2015 02:07:23 -0700")
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> writes:
> + for directory in $(env | grep -Ei '^PROGRAM(FILES(\(X86\))?|W6432)=' |
> + cut -d '=' -f 2- | sort -u)
Is the final "sort" really desired? I am wondering if there are
fixed precedence/preference order among variants of %PROGRAMFILES%
environment variables that the users on the platform are expected
to stick to, but the "sort" is sorting by the absolute pathnames of
where these things are, which may not reflect that order.
Not that I personally care too deeply, as I would expect that it is
likely any one of them found would just work fine ;-)
> + do
> + if test -n "$directory" && test -x "$directory/$winmerge_exe"
> + then
> + printf '%s' "$directory/$winmerge_exe"
> + return
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + printf WinMergeU.exe
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-20 9:07 [PATCH v6 1/2] mergetool--lib: set IFS for difftool and mergetool David Aguilar
2015-05-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mergetools: add winmerge as a builtin tool David Aguilar
2015-05-20 11:09 ` SZEDER Gábor
2015-05-22 19:58 ` David Aguilar
2015-05-22 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-22 20:16 ` David Aguilar
2015-05-20 20:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-05-20 20:20 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2015-05-20 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-20 21:20 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2015-05-21 10:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtwv7m2hw.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=phillsusi@gmail.com \
--cc=sschuberth@gmail.com \
--cc=szeder@ira.uka.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.