From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:00:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtx9m70fh.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53559b0cc066_6c39e772f09d@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:26:20 -0500")
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> ... there are _already_ hooks without pre/post.
Like commit-msg? Yes, it would have been nicer if it were named
verify-commit-message or something.
Old mistakes are harder to change because of inertia. It is not a
good excuse to knowingly make a new mistake to add new exceptions
that the users need to check documentations for, is it?
> And it's not confusing,
A simple fact that Ilya asked the question tells us otherwise ;-)
I personally do not see an immediate need for post-update-branch,
but if the new hook is about intervening an operation, it would be a
good idea to name the hook with "pre-" like other "before doing
something, validate the operation and forbid" hooks. Otherwise it
would be impossible to later add "post-update-branch" for whatever
reason without inviting "why does pre-update-branch hook is misnamed
as just update-branch, when other validation and post-action pair
are named pre-something and post-something?".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-21 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-21 2:23 [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 7:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-21 20:02 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 20:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:15 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:39 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 14:43 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-22 16:31 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 17:09 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 17:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 7:49 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-23 9:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 1:11 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-26 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-26 19:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-24 14:26 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-24 18:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:26 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-04-23 21:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 1:00 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:41 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:36 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:35 ` Felipe Contreras
[not found] ` <CADcHDF+XcWEkvyP3tL4ibicnaMVJpixUZu1Ces0BXWkzPGsodw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-21 22:24 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:05 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 6:45 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 7:00 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 6:56 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:35 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:27 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtx9m70fh.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ilya.bobyr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.