From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Cc: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Karthik Nayak" <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 18:33:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7pfudux.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f731776-9a9e-4c8f-8de9-99d470503345@app.fastmail.com> (Kristoffer Haugsbakk's message of "Sat, 31 May 2025 14:17:34 +0200")
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes:
> On Sat, May 31, 2025, at 05:39, shejialuo wrote:
>> It is reported that "git refs verify" would fail when encountering
>> worktrees created on Git v2.43.0 or older versions. These versions
>
> Nit: maybe
>
> "git refs verify" doesn't work if there are worktrees created on Git
> v2.43.0 ...
Yeah, "It is reported that" was somewhat odd introduction.
>> don't automatically create the "refs" directory, causing the error:
>>
>> error: cannot open directory .git/worktrees/<worktree name>/refs:
>> No such file or directory
The original of this part already reads quite well, I think.
>> Since 8f4c00de95 (builtin/worktree: create refdb via ref backend,
>> 2024-01-08), we automatically create the "refs" directory for new
>> worktrees. However, the fsck code incorrectly assumes all linked
>> worktrees have this directory, thus introducing compatibility issue.
>
> Thanks for finding that commit.
Yup. And that one is v2.44.0-rc0~58^2, and that is where "v2.43" in
the above description comes from.
> At this point in the message it seems like the fsck code never worked
> with these old linked worktrees. But `git refs verify` used to work
> with them until 7c78d819e6a (ref: support multiple worktrees check for
> refs, 2024-11-20) which was part of v2.48.0. So I think it’s worth
> mentioning that commit as well.
Good suggestion.
> Like I said in the first email the only minor regression in this release
> cycle is that git-fsck(1) reports these errors on stderr because the
> default `--reference`. This was how I spotted the issue on rc0. But I
> neglected to mention that the commit that introduced `--references`
> (default) for git-fsck(1) is v2.48.0-rc1-49-gc1cf918d3ad (builtin/fsck:
> add `git refs verify` child process, 2025-02-28).[1]
Thanks for a careful analysis. The "fix" is rather obvious, so
let's see if we can come up with the final wording of the commit log
message and merge it down in time ;-).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-30 19:00 [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs kristofferhaugsbakk
2025-05-30 22:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-31 1:03 ` shejialuo
2025-05-31 9:52 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-05-31 3:39 ` [PATCH] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-05-31 12:17 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-02 1:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-06-02 11:30 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 9:53 ` Phillip Wood
2025-06-02 10:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-06-02 13:50 ` phillip.wood123
2025-06-02 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-02 12:16 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 12:41 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:59 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-02 14:11 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 14:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs shejialuo
2025-06-02 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-06-02 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv7pfudux.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.