All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>,
	 AreaZR via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org,  AreaZR <gfunni234@gmail.com>,
	 Seija Kijin <doremylover123@gmail.com>,
	 Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: exit early from the loop if it is not a main worktree
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:10:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7vgo4u7.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cQd=vc5rte47biFbR+w_DV2OhdCRpC2WH_dKsSi4wvZ2A@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:52:02 -0500")

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 8:30 AM shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 02:20:45AM +0000, AreaZR via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> >               if (is_main_worktree(worktrees[i]))
>> >                       continue;
>> >               ret = 1;
>> > +             break;
>>
>> So, when we find a linked worktree, we just return the value. From my
>> perspective, if we decide to optimize like this way, we could drop the
>> loop because the first element of the result of `get_worktrees` is the
>> main worktree. And we could just check whether the "worktrees[1]" is
>> NULL to do above.
>
> You're correct. get_worktrees() guarantees that the main worktree (or
> bare repository) is the first item in the list, so merely checking
> whether `worktrees[1]` is non-NULL would be sufficient to answer
> whether linked worktrees are present; no looping is required.

Thanks for a well-reasoned write-up.

Would many other callers potentially want to know if the repository
has more than one worktree?  It looks to me that the has_worktrees()
helper function in refs.c is a sign that the worktree API is missing
a function.  Calling get_worktrees() to prepare a list of worktrees
and then counting the result, only to see if there are more than
one, sounds a bit wasteful if we need to do so too often.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-19  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-18  2:20 [PATCH] refs: exit early from the loop if it is not a main worktree AreaZR via GitGitGadget
2024-12-18 13:31 ` shejialuo
2024-12-18 23:52   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-12-19  1:10     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-12-19  5:54       ` Eric Sunshine
2024-12-19  6:12         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-27 14:34         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-27 14:34     ` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqv7vgo4u7.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=doremylover123@gmail.com \
    --cc=gfunni234@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.