From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C336238DEC for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 19:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722454616; cv=none; b=NLUGL72+Kqf8bETUBti4dv/otH/hnKPbJlgXWsXofLca7tQgGYxlYHBT8d1EfwJjRQkRawlLx2gMT2TP1qqPGao5g0icexuzrKxl8lCiR3/ka3ZRjbRZy/ux+mqGA63+A84kJhJLbf12ep9p6V+naijGUX2KuTrsQs202HSp0cc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722454616; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q8AlTG7LJY28WvGRxsBn9lzrzdzcMHdAu5HsDuQmhBQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FYpySmkTHhgh7+eYIu23gZU8Kw6NNV/4G9gjPZ4uCDcDAQmgwNVd3+bEPk2MqE6noWowiP0s22uHsDmE/gdrrmoAwmSOAyLwwXmiX86k/Z+3WmEXG9NCNcEUM5y5fneG9S2oGU6JNc3gT9doU2kQJb/3OdF1daSeOv0fMuDsgqA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=JEfvI8Sr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="JEfvI8Sr" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F243B291; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:36:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=q8AlTG7LJY28WvGRxsBn9lzrzdzcMHdAu5HsDu QmhBQ=; b=JEfvI8SruGW0GUDpjpEQPYCPI+/oPhXrqeLXEXEm/ytCoR5nqq6/HR sZ7AS2San8yfok7575sAGEwtIqaUtM6kdWaMTYFcf66k0lzmLUe1IfSXXqVLGLYe N4L6446OOglfLSnpYSyqTFAbGFEcjiO5Nwv/zWY+qEvKirYGYVizc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B173B290; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:36:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3AF83B288; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:36:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Steadmon Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ren?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Kyle Lippincott , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] t: import the clar unit testing framework In-Reply-To: <463oz7j4btei57brq42zlnsydguu74n2n22rhdq7iwjk4y2bei@6r32nghurrmr> (Josh Steadmon's message of "Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:27:13 -0700") References: <463oz7j4btei57brq42zlnsydguu74n2n22rhdq7iwjk4y2bei@6r32nghurrmr> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:36:51 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3D031E1A-4F74-11EF-88F4-BAC1940A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Josh Steadmon writes: > On 2024.07.31 11:04, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> Import the clar unit testing framework at commit faa8419 (Merge pull >> request #93 from clar-test/ethomson/fixtures, 2023-12-14). The framework >> will be wired up in subsequent commits. > > Rather than forking our own copy of clar, could we just add it as a > submodule instead? I doubt that forking was Patrick's intention to begin with. Convenience is. It certainly is a possibility to bind it as a submodule, but it would be easier for everybody to futz with and experiment, at least while it is in its RFC phase. Thanks.