From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: "Strawbridge, Michael" <Michael.Strawbridge@amd.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tuikov, Luben" <Luben.Tuikov@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] send-email: refactor header generation functions
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:13:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv8l59ot2.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <230117.86wn5lxpl0.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> ("Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:20:58 +0100")
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>> +sub send_message {
>> + my ($recipients_ref, $to, $date, $gitversion, $cc, $ccline, $header) = gen_header();
>
> This makes the diff smaller, but if we're refactoring these functions to
> return arguments it's probably better to return a hash reference rather
> than remembering all the parameter names.
>
> But in this case it's probably fine...
> ...
>> +sub pre_process_file {
>> + my ($t, $quiet) = @_;
>
> This, I think, is an anti-pattern in this file. We can just read the
> "$quiet" and other things that we set up when we parse the parameters as
> globals, we don't need to pass them as named parameters.
>
> It doesn't help readability to shadow that variable with another lexical
> here below:
> ...
Thanks as usual for a careful review, with concrete suggestions for
improvements.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-17 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 21:16 [PATCH v5 0/2] send-email: expose header information to git-send-email's sendemail-validate hook Strawbridge, Michael
2023-01-10 21:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] send-email: refactor header generation functions Strawbridge, Michael
2023-01-17 13:20 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-17 15:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-01-17 21:36 ` Strawbridge, Michael
2023-01-10 21:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] send-email: expose header information to git-send-email's sendemail-validate hook Strawbridge, Michael
2023-01-14 1:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-14 16:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-14 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-15 3:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-17 4:09 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-01-17 4:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-17 4:56 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-01-17 13:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-17 21:58 ` Strawbridge, Michael
2023-01-17 1:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Strawbridge, Michael
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-17 1:37 Strawbridge, Michael
2023-01-17 1:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] send-email: refactor header generation functions Strawbridge, Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv8l59ot2.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Luben.Tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Strawbridge@amd.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.