From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Cc: "Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] read-cache: leave lock in right state in `write_locked_index()`
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 21:02:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqvajsv60e.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0heSojqHEQQfwUaGuLH2TjN+aHSFHg4WAvcd5Ksnxd-54YMg@mail.gmail.com> ("Martin Ågren"'s message of "Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:04:53 +0200")
Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> writes:
> On 6 October 2017 at 04:01, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> v2: Except for the slightly different documentation in cache.h, this is
>>> a squash of the last two patches of v1. I hope the commit message is
>>> better.
>>
>> Yeah, it is long ;-) but readable.
>
> "Long but readable"... Yeah. When I rework the previous patch (document
> the closing-behavior of `do_write_index()`) I could address this. I
> think there are several interesting details here and I'm not sure which
> I'd want to leave out, but yeah, they add up...
I didn't mean "long is bad" at all in this case.
Certainly, from time to time we find commits with overlong
explanation that only states obvious, and they are "long and bad".
But I do not think this one falls into the same category as those.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-06 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-01 14:56 [PATCH 00/11] various lockfile-leaks and -fixes Martin Ågren
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 01/11] sha1_file: do not leak `lock_file` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 5:26 ` Jeff King
2017-10-02 10:15 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 02/11] treewide: prefer lockfiles on the stack Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 3:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 4:12 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 5:34 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 03/11] lockfile: fix documentation on `close_lock_file_gently()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 5:35 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 04/11] tempfile: fix documentation on `delete_tempfile()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 5:38 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 05/11] cache-tree: simplify locking logic Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 3:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 5:41 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] apply: move lockfile into `apply_state` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 5:48 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 07/11] apply: remove `newfd` from `struct apply_state` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 5:50 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 08/11] cache.h: document `write_locked_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 09/11] read-cache: require flags for `write_locked_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 3:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 4:14 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 10:16 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 6:00 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 10/11] read-cache: don't leave dangling pointer in `do_write_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 6:15 ` Jeff King
2017-10-02 6:20 ` Jeff King
2017-10-01 14:56 ` [PATCH 11/11] read-cache: roll back lock on error with `COMMIT_LOCK` Martin Ågren
2017-10-02 4:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 2:37 ` [PATCH 00/11] various lockfile-leaks and -fixes Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 6:22 ` Jeff King
2017-10-02 6:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 10:19 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-03 6:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] " Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] sha1_file: do not leak `lock_file` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 1:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] treewide: prefer lockfiles on the stack Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] lockfile: fix documentation on `close_lock_file_gently()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] tempfile: fix documentation on `delete_tempfile()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] checkout-index: simplify locking logic Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 1:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] cache-tree: " Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] apply: move lockfile into `apply_state` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] apply: remove `newfd` from `struct apply_state` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] cache.h: document `write_locked_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] read-cache: drop explicit `CLOSE_LOCK`-flag Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 1:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-06 11:02 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] read-cache: leave lock in right state in `write_locked_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 2:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-06 11:04 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 12:02 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-10-06 19:44 ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Re: various lockfile-leaks and -fixes Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] sha1_file: do not leak `lock_file` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] treewide: prefer lockfiles on the stack Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] lockfile: fix documentation on `close_lock_file_gently()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] tempfile: fix documentation on `delete_tempfile()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] checkout-index: simplify locking logic Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] cache-tree: " Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] apply: move lockfile into `apply_state` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] apply: remove `newfd` from `struct apply_state` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] cache.h: document `write_locked_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] read-cache: drop explicit `CLOSE_LOCK`-flag Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] read-cache: leave lock in right state in `write_locked_index()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-06 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] read_cache: roll back lock in `update_index_if_able()` Martin Ågren
2017-10-05 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Martin Ågren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqvajsv60e.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.