Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Makefile: add style build rule

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> By the way, I do not know which vintage of /usr/bin/git-clang-format
> I happen to have on my box, but I needed a crude workaround patch
> (attached at the end) ...

I guess you hit the same thing while our messages crossing ;-)


> As to what it does, the first example I tried may not have been a
> great one.  I got this:
>
>         git clang-format --style file --diff --extensions c,h
>         diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
>         index 73e0085186..6462fe25bc 100644
>         --- a/cache.h
>         +++ b/cache.h
>         @@ -1498,11 +1498,8 @@ struct checkout {
>                 const char *base_dir;
>                 int base_dir_len;
>                 struct delayed_checkout *delayed_checkout;
>         -	unsigned force:1,
>         -		 quiet:1,
>         -		 not_new:1,
>         -		a_new_field:1,
>         -		 refresh_cache:1;
>         +	unsigned force : 1, quiet : 1, not_new : 1, a_new_field : 1,
>         +		refresh_cache : 1;
>          };
>          #define CHECKOUT_INIT { NULL, "" }
>  
> which is not wrong per-se, but I have a mixed feelings.  I do not
> want it to complain if the original tried to fit many items on a
> single line, but if the original wanted to have one item per line,
> I'd rather see it kept as-is.

To clarify, the above is after I added a_new_field that is one-bit
wide without doing anything else.  I do not mind the checker
complaining the existing force, quiet, etc. whose widths are all
spelled without SP around ':', because they appear near-by, as a
collateral damage.  My only gripe is that the result got squished
into a single line.

> Anyway, we cannot have perfect checker from the day one, and
> considering this is an initial attempt, I'd say it is a good start.