From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C8220958 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932196AbdC2Rnv (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:43:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50997 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932191AbdC2Rnu (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:43:50 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28556810BF; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:43:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=sCWHFQ5Uo86PZchrwtgXqdlHDrc=; b=mx5af+ qI9V8lXusehS0ms3iHVgJuC4cJsYhuAoULa97b0UuffXIDfstrUS/gtTdQVdRrwE 5UezdbnrfXt2dLLr2wfIDvYSnekR1pxxj6IC3heIp2yqhZk2xEEcFpIBZ/LPZ5Go dJEmakTumSM2uRel8XtiwFMA7CuVnoNQaook0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=j/7WkuzeDlXQ3GbFvUrnbg2HlbI5/x6i 5uy/zPGrXkHhW/YzFTbFTcDjR7rzst0qCRCRYZ0df86MWYAYD17gIr0o/SQKQKjg YqDaiOlpracUD/5SJOk4hRWAMYqXkWDbIT/LnnImThOf2xpZfAt9kb1sCMxfzLyH mhqRMddl7dc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21044810BE; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:43:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CFC8810BD; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:43:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael J Gruber Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Schneider , Luke Diamand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] name-rev sanity References: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:43:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:15:13 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 439E417E-14A7-11E7-A8CF-97B1B46B9B0B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > The first two applies cleanly to the same base as jc/name-rev that > the first two of these patches are meant to replace, but the third > one doesn't apply on top. Are you depending on something newer? Ah, of course, you are depending on your other topic ;-) I'll wiggle these in. Thanks.