All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	"John Keeping" <john@keeping.me.uk>,
	"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re: [PATCH 3/4] t: rev-parse-parents: avoid yoda conditions
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:33:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqvc2b5fkg.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130908042649.GC14019@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 8 Sep 2013 00:26:49 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

>> A(ny) sanely defined "compare A with B" function should yield the
>> result of subtracting B from A, i.e. cmp(A,B) should be like (A-B).
>> That is what you feed qsort() and bsearch() (it is not limited to C;
>> you see the same in "sort { $a <=> $b }").  The definition naturally
>> makes "cmp(A,B) < 0" like "A < B" and "cmp(A,B) > 0" like "A > B".
>> ---
>
> Ah, you mean "if you think that the compare function should behave like
> C *_cmp functions, it should be A-B". Perhaps it is simply that I do not
> think of the function in those terms, but more like "show me the
> differences from B to A".



>
>> > Otherwise why would so many
>> > existing test frameworks do it the other way?
>> 
>> Which many existing frameworks do it the other way?
>
> John mentioned JUnit, NUnit, and PHPUnit earlier in the thread. I
> believe that Ruby's Test::Unit::Assertions also has
> assert_equal(expected, actual).

Especially the last one can be excused.  "is A and B equal" is a
binary between "yes" and "no".  If A and B are equal, B and A are
equal, and it becomes more like "which endianness is correct?" as
you mentioned earlier.

I think the real cause of confusion is that "cmp(1)" is not a
comparison in that sense but is an equality check; "test_cmp" has a
dual purpose in that its primary use as "did the previous step
produce correct result?" is an equality check and the order does not
really matter, but its secondary purpose, to show how the actual
output deviated from the norm, has to be done by subtracting the
expected result from the actual result.

As I said, I am somewhat sympathetic to those who want to see such
subtraction spelled as cmp(Actual,Expect), but we are so used to the
order "diff(1)" takes expect and actual to do that subtraction in
that order, so using diff(Expect,Actual) order is not that wrong.

Calling the abstraction "test_diff" might have avoided the wasted
brain bandwidth in this thread, but I do not think renaming it in
test-lib-functions.sh is worth the trouble, either ;-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-08 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-02  6:30 [PATCH 0/4] t: rev-parse-parents: cleanups Felipe Contreras
2013-09-02  6:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] t: rev-parse-parents: fix style Felipe Contreras
2013-09-02  6:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] t: rev-parse-parents: fix weird ! notation Felipe Contreras
2013-09-02  6:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] t: rev-parse-parents: avoid yoda conditions Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03  7:12   ` Jeff King
2013-09-03  7:51     ` SZEDER Gábor
2013-09-03  8:03       ` Jeff King
2013-09-03 10:45         ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03 11:10           ` SZEDER Gábor
2013-09-03 13:39             ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03 15:08               ` SZEDER Gábor
2013-09-03 17:04                 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 17:05                   ` [PATCH 1/4] rev-parse test: modernize quoting and whitespace Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 17:06                   ` [PATCH 2/4] rev-parse test: use test_must_fail, not "if <command>; then false; fi" Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 21:56                     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03 17:07                   ` [PATCH 3/4] rev-parse test: use test_cmp instead of "test" builtin Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 20:01                     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-04  4:28                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 22:01                     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03 17:11                   ` [PATCH 4/4] rev-parse test: use standard test functions for setup Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 17:15                     ` [PATCH v2 " Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-03 17:20                   ` [PATCH 0/4] Re: [PATCH 3/4] t: rev-parse-parents: avoid yoda conditions Jeff King
2013-09-03 21:53                   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-04 16:47                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-04 17:13                     ` John Keeping
2013-09-04 17:38                       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-04 18:36                         ` Jeff King
2013-09-04 19:14                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-08  3:11                           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08  4:06                             ` Jeff King
2013-09-08  4:13                               ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08  4:14                                 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08  4:26                                 ` Jeff King
2013-09-08  4:52                                   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08  5:02                                     ` Jeff King
2013-09-08 23:25                                       ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08 23:45                                         ` Jeff King
2013-09-09  0:45                                           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08 18:33                                   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-09-08 23:18                                     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-08  8:11                               ` Philip Oakley
2013-09-03 17:31               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-03 17:33                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-03 21:52                 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-02  6:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] t: rev-parse-parents: simplify setup Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqvc2b5fkg.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=szeder@ira.uka.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.