Re: [PATCH 3/5] git-mergetool--lib.sh: add error message in 'setup_user_tool'

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

>  valid_tool () {
> -	setup_tool "$1" && return 0
> +	setup_tool "$1" 2>/dev/null && return 0
>  	cmd=$(get_merge_tool_cmd "$1")
>  	test -n "$cmd"
>  }

As we are checking if a tool is valid, it is normal for setup_tool
to fail when we are checking is not valid (aka "fails to get set
up").  There is no need to show an error message for such a failure,
as the callers of valid_tool would do so if they wish.  OK.

>  setup_user_tool () {
>  	merge_tool_cmd=$(get_merge_tool_cmd "$tool")
> -	test -n "$merge_tool_cmd" || return 1
> +	if test -z "$merge_tool_cmd"
> +	then
> +		echo >&2 "error: ${TOOL_MODE}tool.$tool.cmd not set for tool '$tool'"
> +		return 1
> +	fi

There are only two callers of setup_user_tool, and one of them
squelches this message by sending it to /dev/null.  The error
message composed here does not use anything that is unique to the
function (in other words, $tool and ${TOOL_MODE} are available to
its callers).

I wonder if it is a better design to leave this one as-is, and
instead show the error message from the other caller of
setup_user_tool that does not squelch the message?  Are we planning
to add more callers of this function that want to show the same
message?

>  	diff_cmd () {
>  		( eval $merge_tool_cmd )
> @@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ setup_tool () {
>  
>  	# Now let the user override the default command for the tool.  If
>  	# they have not done so then this will return 1 which we ignore.
> -	setup_user_tool
> +	setup_user_tool 2>/dev/null

If we did that, then this change can be dropped.  Instead, a few
lines above this hunk, we can give the error message ourselves from
this setup_tool function.

>  	if ! list_tool_variants | grep -q "^$tool$"
>  	then
> diff --git a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh
> index 22b3a85b3e9..82a88107850 100755
> --- a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh
> +++ b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh
> @@ -898,4 +898,12 @@ test_expect_success 'mergetool with guiDefault' '
>  	git commit -m "branch1 resolved with mergetool"
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'mergetool with non-existent tool' '
> +	test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
> +	git checkout -b test$test_count branch1 &&
> +	test_must_fail git merge main &&
> +	yes "" | test_must_fail git mergetool --tool=absent >out 2>&1 &&
> +	test_grep -i "not set for tool" out
> +'

Why "-i"?  I do not offhand see the reason why we want to be loose
here.

The "${TOOL_MODE}tool" part may also want to be verified, perhaps,
which was related to the topic of the fix in [2/5]?