From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>,
"Victoria Dye" <vdye@github.com>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"ZheNing Hu" <adlternative@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ls-files: add %(skipworktree) atom to format option
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 04:58:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwn5rseyd.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CABPp-BGsD=6PiJtnsuYPsiZJ1rm2X8yTeu-YeP4q5uu5UDw2og@mail.gmail.com
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> Given my above comments, I personally don't buy this as justification
> for adding a new way of reporting on the skip-worktree bit. It may
> still make sense to add this feature or something like it, but I
> personally think it deserves separate justification from "`ls-files
> -t` is semi-deprecated".
> ...
> To be honest, I don't yet see any compelling reason to use this new
> option. Even if this patch is accepted, I'd just continue using "git
> ls-files -t" (both directly and in scripts) in preference to this.
> However, you have inspired me to try to fix up the ls-files
> documentation and remove the "semi-deprecated" label for the -t
> option.
Thanks. I think that would be the better way forward between the
two (i.e. adding this one-shot new feature vs resurrecting -t).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 15:42 [PATCH] ls-files: add %(skipworktree) atom to format option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2023-01-12 10:00 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-12 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-01-13 4:43 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-13 17:07 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-01-13 16:50 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-01-14 3:00 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-12 10:07 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-13 16:59 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-01-19 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2023-01-19 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: fix sparse-checkout docs link ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2023-01-20 5:12 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-20 9:35 ` Martin Ågren
2023-01-23 15:16 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-01-23 15:15 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-01-19 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ls-files: add %(skipworktree) atom to format option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2023-01-20 5:30 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-20 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-23 15:35 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-01-23 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-23 15:33 ` ZheNing Hu
2023-02-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2023-02-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] docs: fix sparse-checkout docs link ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2023-02-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ls-files: add %(skipworktree) atom to format option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqwn5rseyd.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.