From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2307420A40 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752634AbdLEMh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:37:29 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63500 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752453AbdLEMh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:37:29 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADD3BB3B7; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:37:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hIQr5ok+QAeIiJFdktFvmb7QrL8=; b=ivkYoV KmoyBDrHUdaGd3m0tSJqsR1Qn6oHprow2Ycai0NdS6rFTVvb7E+NVotvs9yjGpXD Y2ULhg2dwaXUKhi3iCqNKKftprh8OtUDJDWoaL2XuDC4euOZpyDDCM4HYOl/8tr/ JJVPxoReZA2ZVZc2Z3r+jx40u73N6dzOgBPmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DNGVF8xAiWBacXeb8oWbFY0ytbrgUoVZ NoC6T84jk3aEhVQUqR6JKbC1aFKMg7jMRfMAcTqD/oFLc1dBiO+ngRA3LUScn/Ir BXcSX0yOXHUklWAD1W7Q75K6SOzQYSTjlGjj6cqunyUfP14TZcBxLHxW4hN9Tdje zReYdki/r5k= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EF3BB3B6; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:37:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE561BB3B4; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:37:27 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: liam Beguin Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] rebase -i: update functions to use a flags parameter References: <20171127045514.25647-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> <20171203221721.16462-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> <20171203221721.16462-7-liambeguin@gmail.com> <22f665eb-0ed1-27d4-7184-e6063ea5b47e@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 04:37:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: <22f665eb-0ed1-27d4-7184-e6063ea5b47e@gmail.com> (liam Beguin's message of "Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:42:43 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0DA64530-D9B9-11E7-B837-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org liam Beguin writes: > I'll change it to TODO_LIST_SHORTED_IDs. TODO_LIST_SHORTED_INSNS would > suggest the flag changes both parts of the todo. I am not a native speaker, but SHORTED does not sound like a right phrase. When you make something shorter, that thing is "shortened", not "shorted".