All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr,
	pranit.bauva@gmail.com, peff@peff.net, pclouds@gmail.com,
	sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwpcvfdao.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170212123630.GA20872@ubuntu-512mb-blr1-01.localdomain> (Siddharth Kannan's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:36:30 +0000")

Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com> writes:

> This "changing the order" gave me the idea to change the flow. I tried to
> implement the above steps without touching the function handle_revision_opt. By
> inserting the handle_revision_arg call just before calling handle_revision_opt.

Changing the order is changing the order of the function calls,
i.e. changing the flow.  So at the idea level we are on the same
page.

I was shooting for not having to duplicate calls to
handle_revision_arg().  

>> But I think the resulting code flow is much closer to the
>> above ideal.
>
> (about Junio's version of the patch): Yes, I agree with you on this. It's like
> the ideal, but the argv has already been populated, so the only remaining step
> is "left++".
>> 
>> Such a change to handle_revision_opt() unfortunately affects other
>> callers of the function, so it may not be worth it.

See the 3-patch series I just sent out.  I didn't think it through
very carefully (especially the error message the other caller
produces), but the whole thing _smells_ correct to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-12 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 18:55 [PATCH 0/2 v3] WIP: allow "-" as a shorthand for "previous branch" Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-10 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-10 18:55   ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] sha1_name: teach get_sha1_1 "-" shorthand for "@{-1}" Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-12  9:48     ` Matthieu Moy
2017-02-12 10:42       ` Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-13 19:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-13 20:03         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-10 23:35   ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision Junio C Hamano
2017-02-11  7:52     ` Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-11 21:08       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-11 23:40         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41           ` [PATCH 0/3] prepare for a rev/range that begins with a dash Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41             ` [PATCH 1/3] handle_revision_opt(): do not update argv[left++] with an unknown arg Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41             ` [PATCH 2/3] setup_revisions(): swap if/else bodies to make the next step more readable Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41             ` [PATCH 3/3] setup_revisions(): allow a rev that begins with a dash Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 12:36         ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-12 18:56           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-02-14  4:23             ` Siddharth Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqwpcvfdao.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.