From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EF82042F for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752906AbcKPTDN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:03:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59929 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752275AbcKPTDM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:03:12 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5F04ED70; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:03:11 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=RjHz9KM3tr3e1Sfv6z3qTc96kng=; b=vp8yV7 4jf2b+sLU81uYrZYKDl9R6EIMtpIK4KTpJzzpuN4H4O3tnlDQc0trYEPLqmm4yUZ FycDKAif67Jw7RqjLSNgwlehhntCvVcSQtysMFIs8OE9+6YhqUEuhnAz2uujJ9+I Js6jndFtjQlXCtrpemHIBx6H1o6mzbAR2HzLI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZURyU9xplevwEVIpN2CHps7WQs/gQuXm NI1PtbBULuHIWRBGIGyqsC0yOrwitc7WhQEOP6TWAQL/EmmMUgXk2QcPMSjg2852 yamLHyI8iiMexuT8C1gi9hRL28JLknQIDFNn672zf25bp3VNVb/2w/7tdvRBIpYQ j08Mzvf2Uao= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D444ED6F; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:03:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 887BB4ED6E; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:03:10 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: David Turner Cc: 'Stefan Beller' , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , "bmwill\@google.com" , "jrnieder\@gmail.com" , "mogulguy10\@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array References: <20161115230651.23953-1-sbeller@google.com> <20161115230651.23953-3-sbeller@google.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:03:09 -0800 In-Reply-To: (David Turner's message of "Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:11:15 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 512791DC-AC2F-11E6-9C2A-987C12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org David Turner writes: >> - "-u", > ... >> + argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "status", "--porcelain", "-uall", > > This also changes -u to -uall, which is not mentioned in the > commit message. That should probably be called out. Or not making that change at all. Isn't "-u" the same as "-uall"?