From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jordan DE GEA <jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
Erwan Mathoniere <erwan.mathoniere@grenoble-inp.org>,
Tom Russello <tom.russello@grenoble-inp.org>,
Samuel Groot <samuel.groot@grenoble-inp.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:30:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwpmgvfif.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E83A9439-54C8-4925-8EE3-6AEEDD9416F3@grenoble-inp.org> (Jordan DE's message of "Thu, 26 May 2016 12:06:33 +0200")
Jordan DE GEA <jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org> writes:
> We are working on full implementation of triangular workflow feature.
> For now, the main options available are:
> - branch.<name>.pushRemote
> - remote.pushDefault
> And only setable by hands.
And once it is set, you do not have to worry about it. I am not
sure per-branch thing is all that useful, unless you are always
working on a single branch like 'master', but the latter would be
just set once and forget about it.
> Context:
> - One main remote repository, e.g. git/git.
> - A remote fork (e.g. a GitHub fork) of git/git, e.g. me/git.
> - A local clone of me/git on the machine
> Purposes:
> - the local branch master has to fetch to git/git by default
> - the local branch master has to push to me/git by default
Wouldn't remote.pushDefault be the single thing you need to set just
once and forget about it? Why would your users even want to do
these things ...
> c. add `git fetch --set-default` in order to set remote.fetchDefault
> d. add `git fetch --set-remote` in order to set branch.<name>.fetchRemote
> e. add `git pull --set-default` in order to set remote.fetchDefault
> f. add `git pull --set-remote` in order to set branch.<name>.fetchRemote
> a. add `git push --set-default` in order to set remote.pushDefault
> b. add `git push --set-remote` in order to set branch.<name>.pushRemote
... just to configure many variables every time they work on a new
branch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-26 10:06 [RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation Jordan DE GEA
2016-05-26 11:04 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-05-26 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-05-30 8:46 ` [RFC] Triangular Workflow UI improvement Jordan DE GEA
2016-05-27 7:32 ` [RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation Philip Oakley
2016-05-30 9:07 ` [RFC] Triangular Workflow UI improvments Jordan DE GEA
2016-05-31 12:28 ` [RFC/PATCH] Triangular Workflow UI improvement: Documentation Jordan DE GEA
2016-05-31 14:33 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-01 9:32 ` Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-02 12:02 ` Michael Haggerty
2016-06-03 7:25 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-03 9:52 ` Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-03 11:36 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-03 11:53 ` Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-05 21:28 ` Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-06 7:58 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-06 16:46 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-06 16:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-06 19:21 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-07 7:03 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-07 20:08 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-03 15:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-03 22:16 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-06 9:48 ` [RFC/PATCHv2] Documentation: triangular workflow Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-06 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-06 22:21 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-07 6:58 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-07 8:02 ` Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-07 8:38 ` [PATCHv3] " Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-07 19:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-08 8:37 ` Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-08 13:20 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-09 12:35 ` [PATCHv4] " Jordan DE GEA
2016-06-09 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-11 15:58 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2016-06-11 19:31 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-09 18:19 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-10 16:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-11 19:25 ` Philip Oakley
2016-06-13 18:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-30 8:39 ` [RFC] Triangular Workflow UI improvement Jordan DE GEA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqwpmgvfif.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=erwan.mathoniere@grenoble-inp.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org \
--cc=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=samuel.groot@grenoble-inp.org \
--cc=tom.russello@grenoble-inp.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.