From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-verify-pack.txt: fix inconsistent spelling of "packfile" Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:34:03 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1431845814-2541-1-git-send-email-ps@pks.im> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Patrick Steinhardt To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 19 21:34:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YunHI-0005p1-1S for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:34:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751314AbbESTeI (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 15:34:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:33198 "EHLO mail-ig0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbbESTeF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 15:34:05 -0400 Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so115497368igb.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:34:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=VS44qMR7I6xibTMhXe42O07Q5qNz2Y1WyszDvhg8jSI=; b=yCl4IlwVKuXrWsIikxS13KL1oEfADuZDt3qymSpxW+HFBHVdYqxzdHuSmG9OpPuI4j kOUZNpPDI97synoKl3Ov0aPaI++UzE2wptrSTgp6xjSZ4LkrR80hYf80Vl0f8HHPhwRa md57jiESgzpuCxhAn+mDPwg4wlM+iMARJA8ftQv/rlIss5KWfFg0qDWcaIe19lApur8A 95wB5dnqzRVBK9+A2UPBngupyz/k2QoKWP0LL7BSXX+mA8masVLwJD8HllNfQS/rMzrQ VEE2+bieVaZ9i57Nv/bJB3KSuy4kDfoWLYAj1Qa6e+PQmXSakb5jTcwQ07cyZ0eJrUpZ Mcbw== X-Received: by 10.50.178.230 with SMTP id db6mr23531813igc.26.1432064045092; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:10c2:1012:799e:649b:b86b:7c03]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k37sm10632303iod.39.2015.05.19.12.34.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 12:34:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1431845814-2541-1-git-send-email-ps@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Sun, 17 May 2015 08:56:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: There still are a handful of "pack-file" remaining in the documentation set, even after applying these three that changes 6 instances of 'pack-file' to 'packfile'. git-index-pack.txt:'git index-pack' [-v] [-o ] git-index-pack.txt: [] git-index-pack.txt: instead and a copy is then written to . If git-index-pack.txt: is not specified, the pack is written to git-index-pack.txt: is not specified consider using --keep to git-unpack-objects.txt:'git unpack-objects' [-n] [-q] [-r] [--strict] < technical/pack-heuristics.txt: Anyway, the pack-file could easily be denser still, but technical/pack-heuristics.txt: In particular, while the pack-file is then compressed, technical/pack-heuristics.txt: Anyway: I'm not even trying to claim that the pack-files technical/pack-protocol.txt: update-request = *shallow ( command-list | push-cert ) [pack-file] technical/pack-protocol.txt: pack-file = "PACK" 28*(OCTET) user-manual.txt:[[pack-files]] A quick "git grep packfile" vs "git grep pack-file" inside Documentation/ directory indicates that we seem to use 'packfile' primarily in the lower-level technical documents that are not end-user facing. Almost half of them are in the release notes that we won't bother "fixing", so it might make sense to go the other way around, consistently using "pack-file" that may be more familiar to end-users. What do others think?