From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/"
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:54:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy0zkj84f.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z3-i5mB4JVeONy4O@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:20:29 +0100")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> So I'm inclined to leave this as-is, maybe adding an escape hatch to
> silence the warnings via an environment variable to give users a bit of
> time to migrate.
OK. I strongly prefer simpler implementation, as long as it won't
make end-user experience (over time across Git 3.0 boundary) overly
unpleasant.
Numbing the pain for short-term gain and letting the inevitable
removal (not deprecation) suddenly hit them is also extremely
unpleasant at Git 3.0 boundary, and such a pain is probably a
problem of their own creation, but I learned after Git 1.6 fiasco
that users always blame us for their own failings, so I still am
fairly reluctant to see us offer a way to squelch the warnings too
easily and forget about it.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-11 10:56 [PATCH 0/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 13:06 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-12-13 5:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 13:20 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 13:20 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 13:25 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 15:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 12:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 13:54 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 13:24 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 15:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 12:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 16:55 ` rsbecker
2025-01-08 6:36 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-08 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-09 10:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-09 12:08 ` Robert Coup
2025-01-09 10:20 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-09 15:54 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-01-06 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 12:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 16:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-20 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-21 21:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-20 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-21 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-22 11:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-21 15:26 ` Jakub Wilk
2025-02-21 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-25 7:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-25 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-26 9:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy0zkj84f.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.