From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sha1-file: use OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:57:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy31wkm97.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD1-=+32G2XYXARcXm8=hnqZwxa1Ev9nmaS=qfqKS7GSWQ@mail.gmail.com> (Christian Couder's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:08:00 +0200")
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:39 PM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/20/2019 4:50 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:30:26AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>> >
>> >> Currently the OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH flag is used to check
>> >> if we should fetch objects from promisor remotes when we
>> >> haven't found them elsewhere.
>> >>
>> >> Now that OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING exists, let's use
>> >> it instead to be more correct in case this new flag is ever
>> >> used without OBJECT_INFO_QUICK.
>> >
>> > I said earlier that this one would need to be tweaked for the new
>> > upstream name. But actually, I think it is not necessary after Stolee's
>> > patch.
>>
>> Yes, I believe that 31f5256c82 does an equivalent thing to the
>> combination of these patches.
>
> Yeah, I agree. Thanks Stolee for having already fixed that, and sorry
> for bothering everyone with this.
OK, I'll stop looking at this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 8:30 [PATCH 0/2] Add OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING flag Christian Couder
2019-06-20 8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] object-store: introduce OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING Christian Couder
2019-06-20 8:48 ` Jeff King
2019-06-20 8:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sha1-file: use OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING Christian Couder
2019-06-20 8:50 ` Jeff King
2019-06-20 12:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-06-20 14:08 ` Christian Couder
2019-06-20 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-06-20 20:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING flag Junio C Hamano
2019-06-21 10:47 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy31wkm97.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.