From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, newren@gmail.com,
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] wrapper: create safe_memory_limit_check()
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:24:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzexal2lv.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b3c67243d200a42aa105981b64228e2cbb35a6c.1789736540.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:02:17 +0000")
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> +static int safe_memory_limit_check(size_t size, int verbose)
> {
> + size_t limit = git_alloc_limit ? git_alloc_limit : SIZE_MAX;
> + if (size > limit) {
> + if (verbose)
> error("attempting to allocate %"PRIuMAX" over limit %"PRIuMAX,
> (uintmax_t)size, (uintmax_t)git_alloc_limit);
> + return -1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
The code is prepared for a case where git_alloc_limit is set to 0,
in which case SIZE_MAX is used as a stand-in value. When the check
detects a request with overly large 'size', the error message tells
us that 'size' is over 'git_alloc_limit', the latter is zero and any
concrete value of 'size' certainly would be over that. Which may be a
bit confusing.
Shouldn't we be giving the local "limit" instead in the message?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 13:02 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Create a 'safe' strbuf API Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] strbuf: add header for 'safe' API Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-21 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-23 19:25 ` Mark C. Chu-Carroll
2026-09-23 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] wrapper: initialize GIT_ALLOC_LIMIT proactively Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] wrapper: create safe_memory_limit_check() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-21 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-09-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] strbuf-safe: add sstrbuf_grow() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-21 21:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] json-writer: include strbuf-safe.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] strbuf-safe: add init and release methods Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-09-21 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-21 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Create a 'safe' strbuf API Phillip Wood
2026-09-23 19:46 ` Jeff King
2026-10-06 14:33 ` Derrick Stolee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqzexal2lv.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.