All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Samuel Abraham <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
	"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
	"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
	"Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Allow reworking with a file after deciding on all its hunks
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 09:26:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzf5rys3f.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADYq+fZFuvCRbFf=-XUR8TJsjW_YtjNdiXMzPv0mjMPbWcLO1g@mail.gmail.com> (Samuel Abraham's message of "Mon, 2 Feb 2026 12:14:16 +0100")

Samuel Abraham <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> writes:

>> I am not sure if I would like the end result or rather prefer your
>> "all-or-none", so please do not take this as "here is a better way
>> to implement it" suggestion.
>>
>> But you should be able to keep the current semantics, if you wanted
>> to, even if you apply the chosen hunks when you switch files, like
>> the original code has been doing forever since it was written.  You
>> know which hunks you applied, so after applying before moving on to
>> the next file, you can drop these hunks from the list of hunks to be
>> decided for application.  When the user comes back to the current
>> file to decide on other hunks, you know that the already used hunks
>> would get in the way, so why keep them?
>
> Yes thank you so much for suggesting this approach.

Not so fast.  I explicitly said I am *NOT* suggesting anything.

And thinking about it more, I do not think it makes any sense to do
anything other than "all-or-none" when the command is working in
your new "you can move to different files before you decide on all
hunks in the current file" mode (which I think we agreed to make it
an optional mode).  Why?  After deciding yes, no, no among 5 hunks
in the first file (leaving the hunks #4 and #5 undecided), you jump
to the second file, do something there, and imagine that you come
back.  If we drop the alrady applied hunks like the suggestion,
which I did not make ;-), we'd then give you four hunks (as hunk #1
has been already applied), and even though you have already decided
not to use hunks #2 and #3, you *can* revisit them with "J" or "K",
change your mind and use them if you wanted to.  But it is too late
for the hunk #1.  It looks utterly inconsistent if you cannot change
your mind on hunk #1 but can on hunks #2 and #3 and it reduces the
usefulness of "you do not have to decide right now and visit other
files before you do so" mode.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-23 11:56 [RFC PATCH 0/1] add-patch: Allow reworking with a file after deciding on its hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-23 11:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] add-patch: Allow reworking with a file after deciding on all " Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-23 16:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-23 21:43     ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-27 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Allow reworking with a file when making hunk decisions Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-27 15:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] Allow reworking with a file after deciding on all its hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-27 20:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-28 11:26       ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-30  9:22         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-30 16:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-30 17:36             ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-31 19:25           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-02 11:14             ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-02 17:26               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-02-03  9:55                 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Allow reworking with a file when making hunk decisions Junio C Hamano
2026-01-28  9:49     ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 15:52   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] introduce new option `rework-with-file` Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 15:54     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] interactive -p: add new `--rework-with-file` flag to interactive machinery Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 18:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:21         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 15:56     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] add-patch: Allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 18:35       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:22         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 18:54       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:32         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 19:21       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:37         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-12 10:32         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-12 17:25           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-12 21:13             ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-12 21:31               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-12 22:20                 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 15:57     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] add-patch: Allow proper 'git apply' when using the --rework-with-file flag Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 19:02       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:39         ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 19:19     ` [PATCH v3 0/3] introduce new option `rework-with-file` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:40       ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-13 22:08     ` [PATCH v4 0/4] introduce new option `--auto-advance` Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 22:09       ` [PATCH v4 1/4] interactive -p: add new `--auto-advance` flag Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 23:04         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-14  9:16           ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-13 22:10       ` [PATCH v4 2/4] add-patch: modify patch_update_file() signature Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 23:33         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-14 10:14           ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-13 22:11       ` [PATCH v4 3/4] add-patch: allow all-or-none application of patches Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 22:12       ` [PATCH v4 4/4] add-patch: allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:01       ` [PATCH v5 0/4] introduce new option `--auto-advance` Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:03         ` [PATCH v5 1/4] interactive -p: add new `--auto-advance` flag Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:04         ` [PATCH v5 2/4] add-patch: modify patch_update_file() signature Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:06         ` [PATCH v5 3/4] add-patch: allow all-or-none application of patches Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:06         ` [PATCH v5 4/4] add-patch: allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-20 22:32         ` [PATCH v5 0/4] introduce new option `--auto-advance` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-21  9:06           ` Samuel Abraham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqzf5rys3f.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
    --cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.